PuSH - Publikationsserver des Helmholtz Zentrums München: The defense-related isoleucic acid differentially accumulates in <em>Arabidopsis</em> among branched-chain amino acid-related 2-hydroxy carboxylic acids. (vol 9, 766, 2018).

Informationen

Hinweise zu Qualitätskriterien von Zeitschriften

Open-Access-Richtlinie der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft 2016

CC Licencences

Metriken für Publikationen

Navigation

Startseite

English

EVA: Veröffentlichen

Neuer EVA Antrag

Recherche

Erweiterte Suche

Durchblättern nach ...

... HMGU-Autoren/Konsortien

... Organisationsstruktur

... Zeitschriften

... Publikationstypen

... Forschungsdaten

... Arbeitsgruppen

... Erscheinungsjahr

Publikationen im Überblick

Statistik

HGF Fortschrittsbericht

OA Publikationen

Eintragen

Neue Publikation eintragen

Neue Publikation holen aus...

...EVA

Fehlende Publikation melden

Highlights

Suche

Hilfe & Kontakt

Ansprechpartner

Hilfe

Datenschutz

Helmholtz Open Science

Bibliometrische Indikatoren

SHERPA/RoMEO

DOAJ

Export:

Text

Endnote (RIS) BIB

BibTeX

Maksym, R.P. ; Ghirardo, A. ; Zhang, W. ; von Saint Paul, V. ; Lange, B. ; Geist, B. ; Hajirezaei, M.R.* ; Schnitzler, J.-P. ; Schäffner, A.

The defense-related isoleucic acid differentially accumulates in Arabidopsis among branched-chain amino acid-related 2-hydroxy carboxylic acids. (vol 9, 766, 2018).

Front. Plant Sci. 11:1088 (2020)

Erratum

DOI

	Open Access Gold

Abstract
Metriken
Zusatzinfos

FIGURE LEGEND In the original article, there was a mistake in the legend for Figure 6 and Figure 7 as published. The numbering for Figure 6 was mixed with Figure 7 and not in agreement with the text: this mistake was introduced during proof stage, since the editing changed both legend and figure number. In addition, DC3000 should not be in italics. The correct numbering of Figures 6 and 7 appear below. FIGURE 6 | BCAA levels after exogenous application of 2-HAs to A. thaliana plants FIGURE 7 | ILA and LA abundance in response to P. syringae virulent strain infection. ERROR IN FIGURE In the original article, there was a mistake in Figures 2–4, and 6 as published. Due to the incorrect calculation of 2-HA level (a factor 50 was missed), all figures showing such measurements have to be replaced with the corrected y axis and limit of detection. The corrected Figures 2–4, and 7 appear below. (Figure presented.).

Altmetric