PuSH - Publikationsserver des Helmholtz Zentrums München: An approach to handling and interpretation of ambiguous data in transcriptome and proteome comparisons.

Informationen

Hinweise zu Qualitätskriterien von Zeitschriften

Open-Access-Richtlinie der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft 2016

CC Licencences

Metriken für Publikationen

Navigation

Startseite

English

EVA: Veröffentlichen

Neuer EVA Antrag

Recherche

Erweiterte Suche

Durchblättern nach ...

... HMGU-Autoren/Konsortien

... Organisationsstruktur

... Zeitschriften

... Publikationstypen

... Forschungsdaten

... Arbeitsgruppen

... Erscheinungsjahr

Publikationen im Überblick

Statistik

HGF Fortschrittsbericht

OA Publikationen

Eintragen

Neue Publikation eintragen

Neue Publikation holen aus...

...EVA

Fehlende Publikation melden

Highlights

Suche

Hilfe & Kontakt

Ansprechpartner

Hilfe

Datenschutz

Helmholtz Open Science

Bibliometrische Indikatoren

SHERPA/RoMEO

DOAJ

Export:

Text

Endnote (RIS) BIB

BibTeX

Irmler, M. ; Hartl, D.* ; Schmidt, T.* ; Schuchhardt, J.* ; Lach, C. ; Meyer, H.E.* ; Hrabě de Angelis, M. ; Klose, J.* ; Beckers, J.

An approach to handling and interpretation of ambiguous data in transcriptome and proteome comparisons.

Proteomics 8, 1165-1169 (2008)

DOI

PMC

Open Access Green möglich sobald Postprint bei der ZB eingereicht worden ist.

Abstract
Metriken
Zusatzinfos

A major challenge towards a comprehensive analysis of biological systems is the integration of data from different omics sources and their interpretation at a functional level. Here we address this issue by analysing transcriptomic and proteomic datasets from mouse brain tissue at embryonic days 9.5 and 13.5. We observe a high concordance between transcripts and their corresponding proteins when they were compared at the level of expression ratios between embryonic stages. Absolute expression values show marginal correlation. We show in examples, that poor concordance between protein and transcript expression is in part explained by the fact, that single genes give rise to multiple transcripts and protein variants. The integration of transcriptomic and proteomic data therefore requires proper handling of such ambiguities. A closer inspection of such cases in our datasets suggests, that comparing gene expression at exon level instead of gene level could improve the comparability. To address the biological relevance of differences in expression profiles, literature-data mining and analysis of gene ontology terms are widely used. We show here, that this can be complemented by the inspection of physical properties of genes, transcripts, and proteins.

Impact Factor

Scopus SNIP

Web of Science
Times Cited

Scopus
Cited By

Altmetric

5.479

1.600