PuSH - Publikationsserver des Helmholtz Zentrums München: Deep insights into the plant proteome by pretreatment with combinatorial hexapeptide ligand libraries.

Informationen

Hinweise zu Qualitätskriterien von Zeitschriften

Open-Access-Richtlinie der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft 2016

CC Licencences

Metriken für Publikationen

Navigation

Startseite

English

EVA: Veröffentlichen

Neuer EVA Antrag

Recherche

Erweiterte Suche

Durchblättern nach ...

... HMGU-Autoren/Konsortien

... Organisationsstruktur

... Zeitschriften

... Publikationstypen

... Forschungsdaten

... Arbeitsgruppen

... Erscheinungsjahr

Publikationen im Überblick

Statistik

HGF Fortschrittsbericht

OA Publikationen

Eintragen

Neue Publikation eintragen

Neue Publikation holen aus...

...EVA

Fehlende Publikation melden

Highlights

Suche

Hilfe & Kontakt

Ansprechpartner

Hilfe

Datenschutz

Helmholtz Open Science

Bibliometrische Indikatoren

SHERPA/RoMEO

DOAJ

Export:

Text

Endnote (RIS) BIB

BibTeX

Fröhlich, A. ; Lindermayr, C.

Deep insights into the plant proteome by pretreatment with combinatorial hexapeptide ligand libraries.

J. Proteomics 74, 1182-1189 (2011)

DOI

PMC

Open Access Green möglich sobald Postprint bei der ZB eingereicht worden ist.

Abstract
Metriken
Zusatzinfos

Proteome analyses suffer from the large complexity of even small proteomes. Additionally, in many protein samples a few highly abundant proteins are hindering detailed proteomic studies, since they mask low abundant proteins. Recently, a new technology has emerged, which reduces dynamic range of protein concentrations within a given sample using combinatorial hexapeptide ligand libraries (CPLLs). This technique has been widely used in the microbial, animal and human fields and is now going to enter plant research. It can be a useful tool for fractionation of protein samples and might help to get a deeper insight into specific plant proteomes. In this review we describe the CPLL protein fractionation, summarize its possible applications in the plant field and discuss the limitations of this method.

Impact Factor

Scopus SNIP

Web of Science
Times Cited

Scopus
Cited By

Altmetric

5.074

1.040