Open Access Gold möglich sobald Verlagsversion bei der ZB eingereicht worden ist.
Strahlenbelastung der Augenlinse bei ureterorenoskopischen Eingriffen ohne und mit Strahlenschutzvisier: Untersuchungen an einem Phantommodell.
Eye lens radiation exposure during ureteroscopy with and without a face protection shield: Investigations on a phantom model.
Urologe 55, 364-369 (2016)
Background and objectives: Eye lens radiation exposure during radiologically-guided endoscopic procedures may result in radiation-induced cataracts; therefore, we investigated the ocular radiation exposure during ureteroscopy on a phantom model. Materials and methods: Using an Alderson phantom model and eye lens dosimeters, we measured the ocular radiation exposure depending on the number of X-ray images and on the duration of fluoroscopic imaging. The measurements were done with and without using a face protection shield. Results: We could demonstrate that a significant ocular radiation exposure can occur, depending on the number of X-ray images and on the duration time of fluoroscopy. Eye lens doses up to 0.025 mSv were recorded even using modern digital X-ray systems. Using face protection shields this ocular radiation exposure can be reduced to a minimum. Conclusion: The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommendations of a mean eye lens dosage of 20 mSv/year may be exceeded during repeated ureteroscopy by a high volume surgeon. Using a face protection shield, the eye lens dose during ureteroscopy could be reduced to a minimum in a phantom model. Further investigations will show whether these results can be transferred to real life ureteroscopic procedures.
Altmetric
Weitere Metriken?
Zusatzinfos bearbeiten
[➜Einloggen]
Publikationstyp
Artikel: Journalartikel
Dokumenttyp
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Schlagwörter
Alderson Phantom ; Cataract ; Exposure Time ; Eye Lens Dose ; Ureteroscopy; Cataract; Risk
ISSN (print) / ISBN
0340-2592
e-ISSN
1433-0563
Zeitschrift
Urologe, Der
Quellenangaben
Band: 55,
Heft: 3,
Seiten: 364-369
Verlag
Springer
Verlagsort
Heidelberg
Begutachtungsstatus
Peer reviewed
Institut(e)
Auswertungsstelle (AWST)