Startseite
Login
English
Erweiterte Suche
Durchblättern nach ...
Publikationen im Überblick
Ansprechpartner
Hilfe
DOI
 |
|
Open Access Green möglich sobald Postprint bei der ZB eingereicht worden ist.
Reporting health care decision models: A prospective reliability study of a multidimensional evaluation framework.
Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res. 16, 619-627 (2015)
© 2015 Taylor & Francis The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of the Phillips-checklist, a proposed framework for the quality assessment of modeling studies. Six raters evaluated nine modeling studies from three different medical specialties. Intra-class correlation (ICC) and corresponding variance components were estimated from these studies. Raters were asked to comment on their experience with the framework. While overall the mean inter-rater reliability showed no significant rater-effect (ICC = 0.69, p = 0.064), there was – presumably as a result of a lower study variability – a significant rater effect for clopidogrel only (p < 0.001). The framework allowed a more structured methodological assessment but several items remained unclear. Regarding the quality assessment of modeling studies with the proposed framework, the rater variability is similar or even higher than variability because of studies or residual effects. Several scoring items can and should be improved to ease interpretation.
Altmetric
Weitere Metriken?
Zusatzinfos bearbeiten
[➜Einloggen]
Publikationstyp
Artikel: Journalartikel
Dokumenttyp
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Schlagwörter
Cost–effectiveness ; Inter-rater Reliability ; Intra Class-correlation ; Methodological Assessment ; Modeling Studies; Major Depressive Disorder; Cost-effectiveness; Economic Evaluations; Task-force; Insulin Glargine; Guidelines; Clopidogrel; Quality; Uk; Recommendations
ISSN (print) / ISBN
1473-7167
e-ISSN
1744-8379
Quellenangaben
Band: 16,
Heft: 5,
Seiten: 619-627
Verlag
Taylor & Francis
Verlagsort
London
Begutachtungsstatus
Peer reviewed