PuSH - Publikationsserver des Helmholtz Zentrums München

Export: TXT Text RIS Endnote (RIS) BIB BibTeX
Vives, i, Batlle, J.* ; Balonov, M.* ; Beaugelin-Seiller, K.* ; Beresford, N.A.* ; Brown, J.* ; Cheng, J.J.* ; Copplestone, D.* ; Doi, M.* ; Filistovic, V.* ; Golikov, V.* ; Horyna, J.* ; Hosseini, A.* ; Howard, B.J.* ; Jones, S.R.* ; Kamboj, S.* ; Kryshev, A.* ; Nedveckaite, T.* ; Olyslaegers, G.* ; Pröhl, G. ; Sazykina, T.* ; Ulanowski, A. ; Vives, Lynch, S.* ; Yankovich, T.* ; Yu, C.*

Inter-comparison of absorbed dose rates for non-human biota.

Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 46, 349-373 (2007)
DOI PMC
Open Access Green möglich sobald Postprint bei der ZB eingereicht worden ist.
A number of approaches have been proposed to estimate the exposure of non-human biota to ionizing radiation. This paper reports an inter-comparison of the unweighted absorbed dose rates for the whole organism (compared as dose conversion coefficients, or DCCs) for both internal and external exposure, estimated by 11 of these approaches for selected organisms from the Reference Animals and Plants geometries as proposed by the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Inter-comparison results indicate that DCCs for internal exposure compare well between the different approaches, whereas variation is greater for external exposure DCCs. Where variation among internal DCCs is greatest, it is generally due to different daughter products being included in the DCC of the parent. In the case of external exposures, particularly to low-energy beta-emitters, variations are most likely to be due to different media densities being assumed. On a radionuclide-by-radionuclide basis, the different approaches tend to compare least favourably for (3)H, (14)C and the alpha-emitters. This is consistent with models with different source/target geometry assumptions showing maximum variability in output for the types of radiation having the lowest range across matter. The intercomparison demonstrated that all participating approaches to biota dose calculation are reasonably comparable, despite a range of different assumptions being made.
Impact Factor
Scopus SNIP
Web of Science
Times Cited
Scopus
Cited By
Altmetric
1.090
0.000
67
73
Tags
Anmerkungen
Besondere Publikation
Auf Hompepage verbergern

Zusatzinfos bearbeiten
Eigene Tags bearbeiten
Privat
Eigene Anmerkung bearbeiten
Privat
Auf Publikationslisten für
Homepage nicht anzeigen
Als besondere Publikation
markieren
Publikationstyp Artikel: Journalartikel
Dokumenttyp Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Sprache englisch
Veröffentlichungsjahr 2007
HGF-Berichtsjahr 0
ISSN (print) / ISBN 0301-634X
e-ISSN 1432-2099
Zeitschrift Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
Quellenangaben Band: 46, Heft: 4, Seiten: 349-373 Artikelnummer: , Supplement: ,
Verlag Springer
Begutachtungsstatus Peer reviewed
Institut(e) Institute of Radiation Protection (ISS)
POF Topic(s) 30504 - Mechanisms of Genetic and Environmental Influences on Health and Disease
Forschungsfeld(er) Radiation Sciences
PSP-Element(e) G-501100-005
PubMed ID 17665210
DOI 10.1007/s00411-007-0124-1
WOS ID 000250208400005
Scopus ID 35349006441
Erfassungsdatum 2007-11-19
[➜Korrektur melden]