PuSH - Publikationsserver des Helmholtz Zentrums München

Ziemssen, F.* ; Feng, Y.S.* ; Schnichels, S.* ; Bayyoud, T.* ; Ueffing, M.* ; Bartz-Schmidt, K.U.* ; Martus, P.* ; Peter, A.

Testing for SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence: Experiences of a tertiary eye centre.

BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 6:e000688 (2021)
Verlagsversion DOI PMC
Open Access Gold
Creative Commons Lizenzvertrag
Introduction The actual prevalence of a SARS-CoV-2 infection and the individual assessment of being or having been infected may differ. Facing the great uncertainty - especially at the beginning of the pandemic - and the possibility of asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, subclinical infections, we evaluate the experience of SARS-CoV-2 antibody screening at a tertiary clinical setting. Methods and analysis All employees of a tertiary eye centre and a research institute of ophthalmology were offered antibody testing in May 2020, using a sequential combination of different validated assays/antigens and point-of-care (POC) testing for a subset (NCT04446338). Before taking blood, a systematic inquiry into past symptoms, known contacts and a subjective self-assessment was documented. The correlations between serostatus, patient contacts and demographic characteristics were analysed. Different tests were compared by Kappa statistics. Results Among 318 participants, SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in 9 employees. Chemiluminescence assays (chemiluminescence immunoassay and electrochemiluminescence) showed superior specificity and high reproducibility, compared with ELISA and POC results. In contrast to the low seropositivity (2.8%) of healthcare workers, higher than that of the other departments of the hospital, a large proportion mistakenly assumed that they might have already been infected. Antiviral antibody titres increased and remained on a plateau for at least 3 months. Conclusions The great demand and acceptance confirmed the benefit of highly sensitive testing methods in the early phase of the pandemic. The coincidence of low seroprevalence and anxious employees may have contributed to internalising the need of hygiene measures.
Impact Factor
Scopus SNIP
Altmetric
0.800
1.268
Tags
Anmerkungen
Besondere Publikation
Auf Hompepage verbergern

Zusatzinfos bearbeiten
Eigene Tags bearbeiten
Privat
Eigene Anmerkung bearbeiten
Privat
Auf Publikationslisten für
Homepage nicht anzeigen
Als besondere Publikation
markieren
Publikationstyp Artikel: Journalartikel
Dokumenttyp Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Schlagwörter Covid-19 ; Infection ; Public Health
Sprache englisch
Veröffentlichungsjahr 2021
HGF-Berichtsjahr 2021
ISSN (print) / ISBN 2397-3269
e-ISSN 2397-3269
Quellenangaben Band: 6, Heft: 1, Seiten: , Artikelnummer: e000688 Supplement: ,
Verlag BMJ Publishing Group
Begutachtungsstatus Peer reviewed
POF Topic(s) 90000 - German Center for Diabetes Research
Forschungsfeld(er) Helmholtz Diabetes Center
PSP-Element(e) G-502400-001
Scopus ID 85104133542
PubMed ID 34192154
Erfassungsdatum 2021-04-22