Open Access Gold möglich sobald Verlagsversion bei der ZB eingereicht worden ist.
A note on cherry-picking in meta-analyses.
Entropy 25:691 (2023)
We study selection bias in meta-analyses by assuming the presence of researchers (meta-analysts) who intentionally or unintentionally cherry-pick a subset of studies by defining arbitrary inclusion and/or exclusion criteria that will lead to their desired results. When the number of studies is sufficiently large, we theoretically show that a meta-analysts might falsely obtain (non)significant overall treatment effects, regardless of the actual effectiveness of a treatment. We analyze all theoretical findings based on extensive simulation experiments and practical clinical examples. Numerical evaluations demonstrate that the standard method for meta-analyses has the potential to be cherry-picked.
Altmetric
Weitere Metriken?
Zusatzinfos bearbeiten
[➜Einloggen]
Publikationstyp
Artikel: Journalartikel
Dokumenttyp
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Schlagwörter
Adversarial Meta-analysis ; Cherry-picking Studies ; Inclusion/exclusion Criteria ; Meta-analysis ; Selection Bias
e-ISSN
1099-4300
Zeitschrift
Entropy
Quellenangaben
Band: 25,
Heft: 4,
Artikelnummer: 691
Verlag
MDPI
Nichtpatentliteratur
Publikationen
Begutachtungsstatus
Peer reviewed
Institut(e)
Institute of AI for Health (AIH)