OpenSSL SSL_connect: Connection reset by peer in connection to v2.sherpa.ac.uk:443 PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München: A framework for assessing Health Economic Evaluation (HEE) quality appraisal instruments.

PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München

A framework for assessing Health Economic Evaluation (HEE) quality appraisal instruments.

BMC Health Serv. Res. 12:253 (2012)
Publ. Version/Full Text Volltext DOI PMC
Open Access Gold
Creative Commons Lizenzvertrag
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Health economic evaluations support the health care decision-making process by providing information on costs and consequences of health interventions. The quality of such studies is assessed by health economic evaluation (HEE) quality appraisal instruments. At present, there is no instrument for measuring and improving the quality of such HEE quality appraisal instruments. Therefore, the objectives of this study are to establish a framework for assessing the quality of HEE quality appraisal instruments to support and improve their quality, and to apply this framework to those HEE quality appraisal instruments which have been subject to more scrutiny than others, in order to test the framework and to demonstrate the shortcomings of existing HEE quality appraisal instruments. METHODS: To develop the quality assessment framework for HEE quality appraisal instruments, the experiences of using appraisal tools for clinical guidelines are used. Based on a deductive iterative process, clinical guideline appraisal instruments identified through literature search are reviewed, consolidated, and adapted to produce the final quality assessment framework for HEE quality appraisal instruments. RESULTS: The final quality assessment framework for HEE quality appraisal instruments consists of 36 items organized within 7 dimensions, each of which captures a specific domain of quality. Applying the quality assessment framework to four existing HEE quality appraisal instruments, it is found that these four quality appraisal instruments are of variable quality. CONCLUSIONS: The framework described in this study should be regarded as a starting point for appraising the quality of HEE quality appraisal instruments. This framework can be used by HEE quality appraisal instrument producers to support and improve the quality and acceptance of existing and future HEE quality appraisal instruments. By applying this framework, users of HEE quality appraisal instruments can become aware of methodological deficiencies inherent in existing HEE quality appraisal instruments. These shortcomings of existing HEE quality appraisal instruments are illustrated by the pilot test.
Altmetric
Additional Metrics?
Edit extra informations Login
Publication type Article: Journal article
Document type Scientific Article
Corresponding Author
Keywords CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY; TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; CRITERIA; TRIALS; NEED
ISSN (print) / ISBN 1472-6963
e-ISSN 1472-6963
Quellenangaben Volume: 12, Issue: 1, Pages: , Article Number: 253 Supplement: ,
Publisher BioMed Central
Non-patent literature Publications
Reviewing status Peer reviewed