Open Access Green as soon as Postprint is submitted to ZB.
Is there a gain from "chance-corrected" measures of diagnostic validity?
J. Clin. Epidemiol. 50, 117-120 (1997)
Several authors have proposed alternatives to sensitivity and specificity which they recommend as so-called "chance-corrected" versions of these parameters of diagnostic validity. We argue that these new measures have some undesirable properties in comparison with the established measures and no substantial advantages. In particular, the extension of this concept to chance-corrected ROC curves is shown to be less useful than classical ROC analysis.
Altmetric
Additional Metrics?
Edit extra informations
Login
Publication type
Article: Journal article
Document type
Scientific Article
Keywords
diagnostic test; validity; chance-correction; ROC; kappa; sensitivity; AGREEMENT; SENSITIVITY; SPECIFICITY; KAPPA; TESTS
ISSN (print) / ISBN
0895-4356
e-ISSN
0895-4356
Journal
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Quellenangaben
Volume: 50,
Issue: 1,
Pages: 117-120
Publisher
Elsevier
Non-patent literature
Publications
Reviewing status
Peer reviewed