PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München

Sommer, C.M.* ; Schwarzwälder, C.B.* ; Stiller, W.* ; Schindera, S.T.* ; Stampfl, U.* ; Bellemann, N.* ; Holzschuh, M.* ; Schmidt, J.* ; Weitz, J.* ; Grenacher, L.* ; Kauczor, H.U.* ; Radeleff, B.A.*

Iodine removal in intravenous dual-energy CT-cholangiography: Is virtual non-enhanced imaging effective to replace true non-enhanced imaging?

Eur. J. Radiol. 81, 692-699 (2012)
DOI PMC
Open Access Green as soon as Postprint is submitted to ZB.
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether virtual non-enhanced imaging (VNI) is effective to replace true non-enhanced imaging (TNI) applying iodine removal in intravenous dual-energy CT-cholangiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2009 until February 2010, fifteen potential donors for living-related liver transplantation (mean age 37.6±10.8 years) were included. Potential donors underwent a two-phase CT-examination of the liver. The first phase consisted of a single-energy non-enhanced CT-acquisition that provided TNI. After administration of hepatobiliary contrast agent, the second phase was performed as a dual-energy cholangiographic CT-acquisition. This provided VNI. Objective image quality (attenuation values [bile ducts and liver parenchyma] and contrast-to-noise ratio) and subjective overall image quality (1 - excellent; 5 - non diagnostic) were evaluated. Effective radiation dose was compared. RESULTS: For TNI and VNI, attenuation values for bile ducts were 16.8±11.2HU and 5.5±17.0HU (p<0.05) and for liver parenchyma 55.3±8.4HU and 58.1±10.6HU (n.s.). For TNI and VNI, contrast-to-noise ratio was 2.6±0.6HU and 6.9±2.1HU (p<0.001). For VNI, subjective overall image quality was 1 in ten datasets, 2 in four datasets and 3 in one dataset. Effective radiation dose for the dual-energy cholangiographic CT-acquisition was 3.6±0.9mSv and for two-phase single-energy CT-cholangiography 5.1±1.3mSv (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study on iodine removal in intravenous dual-energy CT-cholangiography, subjective image quality is equivalent, contrast-to-noise ratio is improved and effective radiation dose is reduced when VNI is performed. The differences between TNI and VNI with respect to attenuation values seem to have limited clinical relevance and therefore we consider VNI as effective to replace TNI.
Impact Factor
Scopus SNIP
Web of Science
Times Cited
Scopus
Cited By
Altmetric
0.000
1.359
11
31
Tags
Annotations
Special Publikation
Hide on homepage

Edit extra information
Edit own tags
Private
Edit own annotation
Private
Hide on publication lists
on hompage
Mark as special
publikation
Publication type Article: Journal article
Document type Scientific Article
Language english
Publication Year 2012
HGF-reported in Year 0
ISSN (print) / ISBN 0720-048X
e-ISSN 0720-048X
Quellenangaben Volume: 81, Issue: 4, Pages: 692-699 Article Number: , Supplement: ,
Publisher Elsevier
Reviewing status Peer reviewed
Institute(s) Institute of Pancreatic Islet Research (IPI)
PubMed ID 21353419
Erfassungsdatum 2011-12-31