Home
Deutsch
Advanced Search
Browse by ...
Publication overview
Contact persons
Help
DOI
 |
|
Open Access Green as soon as Postprint is submitted to ZB.
Reporting health care decision models: A prospective reliability study of a multidimensional evaluation framework.
Expert Rev. Pharmacoecon. Outcomes Res. 16, 619-627 (2015)
© 2015 Taylor & Francis The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-rater reliability of the Phillips-checklist, a proposed framework for the quality assessment of modeling studies. Six raters evaluated nine modeling studies from three different medical specialties. Intra-class correlation (ICC) and corresponding variance components were estimated from these studies. Raters were asked to comment on their experience with the framework. While overall the mean inter-rater reliability showed no significant rater-effect (ICC = 0.69, p = 0.064), there was – presumably as a result of a lower study variability – a significant rater effect for clopidogrel only (p < 0.001). The framework allowed a more structured methodological assessment but several items remained unclear. Regarding the quality assessment of modeling studies with the proposed framework, the rater variability is similar or even higher than variability because of studies or residual effects. Several scoring items can and should be improved to ease interpretation.
Altmetric
Additional Metrics?
Edit extra informations
Login
Publication type
Article: Journal article
Document type
Scientific Article
Keywords
Cost–effectiveness ; Inter-rater Reliability ; Intra Class-correlation ; Methodological Assessment ; Modeling Studies; Major Depressive Disorder; Cost-effectiveness; Economic Evaluations; Task-force; Insulin Glargine; Guidelines; Clopidogrel; Quality; Uk; Recommendations
ISSN (print) / ISBN
1473-7167
e-ISSN
1744-8379
Quellenangaben
Volume: 16,
Issue: 5,
Pages: 619-627
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Publishing Place
London
Non-patent literature
Publications
Reviewing status
Peer reviewed