PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München: Calibration bias of experimentally determined chlorine isotope enrichment factors: The need for a two-point calibration in compound-specific chlorine isotope analysis.

Information

Clues to quality of journals

Open Access Policy of Helmholtz Association 2016

CC Licencences

Publication Metrics

Navigation

Home

Deutsch

EVA: Electronic Publishing

New EVA Application

Research

Advanced Search

Browse by ...

... HMGU-Authors/Consortia

... Organizational Structure

... Journal

... Publication Type

... Research Data

... Arbeitsgruppen

... Publication Year

Publication overview

Statistics

Statistics (last 5 years)

OA Publications

Publish

Submit Publication

Import publication from...

...EVA

Report missing publication

Highlights

Support & Contact

Contact persons

Help

Data protection

Helmholtz Open Science

JANE Journal Estimator

SHERPA/RoMEO

DOAJ

Export:

Text

Endnote (RIS) BIB

BibTeX

Ebert, K.A.* ; Laskov, C.* ; Elsner, M. ; Haderlein, S.B.*

Calibration bias of experimentally determined chlorine isotope enrichment factors: The need for a two-point calibration in compound-specific chlorine isotope analysis.

Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 31, 68-74 (2017)

Postprint

DOI

PMC

	Open Access Green

Abstract
Metrics
Extra information

RATIONALE: The recent development of compound-specific online chlorine isotope analysis ((37) Cl-CSIA) methods has fostered dual chlorine-carbon isotope studies to gain better insights into sources and environmental transformation reactions of chlorinated ethenes (CEs). 1-point and 2-point calibration schemes are currently used to convert raw data to the international δ(37) ClSMOC scale, but a critical evaluation of best practices to arrive at reliable δ(37) ClSMOC signatures and enrichment factors was missing and is presented here. METHODS: Aqueous solutions of neat PCE and TCE and aqueous samples from a TCE biodegradation experiment with pure cultures of Desulfitobacterium hafniense Y51 were analysed for their chlorine isotope ratios using GC/qMS and GC/IRMS. The δ(37) ClSMOC values were obtained using 1-point and 2-point calibration schemes. Chlorine isotope enrichment factors, ɛCl , were calculated using both approaches and the corresponding bias of δ(37) ClSMOC values introduced by the different types of calibration was determined. RESULTS: Different calibration methods resulted in significant differences (up to 30%) in both δ(37) Cl signatures and ɛCl -values. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that a 2-point calibration together with comprehensive information on reference materials is indispensable and should become standard practice for reliable (37) Cl-CSIA of organic compounds.

Impact Factor

Scopus SNIP

Web of Science
Times Cited

Scopus
Cited By

Altmetric

1.998

0.792