Rauh, S.P.* ; Heymans, M.W.* ; Koopman, A.D.M.* ; Nijpels, G.* ; Stehouwer, C.D.* ; Thorand, B. ; Rathmann, W.G.* ; Meisinger, C. ; Peters, A. ; de Las Heras Gala, T. ; Glümer, C.* ; Pedersen, O.* ; Cederberg, H.* ; Kuusisto, J.* ; Laakso, M.* ; Pearson, E.R.* ; Franks, P.W.* ; Rutters, F.* ; Dekker, J.M.*
     
    
        
Predicting glycated hemoglobin levels in the non-diabetic general population: Development and validation of the DIRECTDETECT prediction model-a DIRECT study.
    
    
        
    
    
        
        PLoS ONE 12:e0171816 (2017)
    
    
    
      
      
	
	    Aims/hypothesis To develop a prediction model that can predict HbA1c levels after six years in the non-diabetic general population, including previously used readily available predictors. Methods Data from 5,762 initially non-diabetic subjects from three population-based cohorts (Hoorn Study, Inter99, KORA S4/F4) were combined to predict HbA1c levels at six year follow-up. Using backward selection, age, BMI, waist circumference, use of anti-hypertensive medication, current smoking and parental history of diabetes remained in sex-specific linear regression models. To minimize overfitting of coefficients, we performed internal validation using bootstrapping techniques. Explained variance, discrimination and calibration were assessed using R2, classification tables (comparing highest/lowest 50% HbA1c levels) and calibration graphs. The model was externally validated in 2,765 non-diabetic subjects of the population-based cohort METSIM. Results At baseline, mean HbA1c level was 5.6% (38 mmol/mol). After a mean follow-up of six years, mean HbA1c level was 5.7% (39 mmol/mol). Calibration graphs showed that predicted HbA1c levels were somewhat underestimated in the Inter99 cohort and overestimated in the Hoorn and KORA cohorts, indicating that the model's intercept should be adjusted for each cohort to improve predictions. Sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) were 55.7% (53.9, 57.5) and 56.9% (55.1, 58.7) respectively, for women, and 54.6% (52.7, 56.5) and 54.3% (52.4, 56.2) for men. External validation showed similar performance in the METSIM cohort. Conclusions/interpretation In the non-diabetic population, our DIRECT-DETECT prediction model, including readily available predictors, has a relatively low explained variance and moderate discriminative performance, but can help to distinguish between future highest and lowest HbA1c levels. Absolute HbA1c values are cohort-dependent.
	
	
	    
	
       
      
	
	    
		Impact Factor
		Scopus SNIP
		Web of Science
Times Cited
		Scopus
Cited By
		Altmetric
		
	     
	    
	 
       
      
     
    
        Publication type
        Article: Journal article
    
 
    
        Document type
        Scientific Article
    
 
    
        Thesis type
        
    
 
    
        Editors
        
    
    
        Keywords
        Type-2 Diabetes Risk; Hispanic White Adults; Kora S4/f4 Cohort; Life-style; Insulin Sensitivity; Caucasian Population; Glucose-tolerance; Follow-up; Metaanalysis; Mellitus
    
 
    
        Keywords plus
        
    
 
    
    
        Language
        english
    
 
    
        Publication Year
        2017
    
 
    
        Prepublished in Year
        
    
 
    
        HGF-reported in Year
        2017
    
 
    
    
        ISSN (print) / ISBN
        1932-6203
    
 
    
        e-ISSN
        
    
 
    
        ISBN
        
    
    
        Book Volume Title
        
    
 
    
        Conference Title
        
    
 
	
        Conference Date
        
    
     
	
        Conference Location
        
    
 
	
        Proceedings Title
        
    
 
     
	
    
        Quellenangaben
        
	    Volume: 12,  
	    Issue: 2,  
	    Pages: ,  
	    Article Number: e0171816 
	    Supplement: ,  
	
    
 
    
        
            Series
            
        
 
        
            Publisher
            Public Library of Science (PLoS)
        
 
        
            Publishing Place
            Lawrence, Kan.
        
 
	
        
            Day of Oral Examination
            0000-00-00
        
 
        
            Advisor
            
        
 
        
            Referee
            
        
 
        
            Examiner
            
        
 
        
            Topic
            
        
 
	
        
            University
            
        
 
        
            University place
            
        
 
        
            Faculty
            
        
 
    
        
            Publication date
            0000-00-00
        
 
         
        
            Application date
            0000-00-00
        
 
        
            Patent owner
            
        
 
        
            Further owners
            
        
 
        
            Application country
            
        
 
        
            Patent priority
            
        
 
    
        Reviewing status
        Peer reviewed
    
 
    
        Institute(s)
        Institute of Epidemiology (EPI)
    
 
    
        POF-Topic(s)
        30202 - Environmental Health
90000 - German Center for Diabetes Research
    
 
    
        Research field(s)
        Genetics and Epidemiology
    
 
    
        PSP Element(s)
        G-504000-002
G-504000-006
G-501900-401
G-504090-001
    
 
    
        Grants
        
    
 
    
        Copyright
        
    
 	
    
    
    
    
    
        Erfassungsdatum
        2017-03-07