PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München

Ekström, M.* ; Schiöler, L.* ; Grønseth, R.* ; Johannessen, A.* ; Svanes, C.* ; Leynaert, B.* ; Jarvis, D.* ; Gislason, T.* ; Demoly, P.* ; Probst-Hensch, N.* ; Pin, I.* ; Corsico, A.G.* ; Forsberg, B.* ; Heinrich, J. ; Nowak, D.* ; Raherison-Semjen, C.* ; Dharmage, S.C.* ; Trucco, G.* ; Urrutia, I.* ; Martinez-Moratalla Rovira, J.* ; Sánchez-Ramos, J.L.* ; Janson, C.* ; Torén, K.*

Absolute values of lung function explain the sex difference in breathlessness in the general population.

Eur. Respir. J. 49:1602047 (2017)
Publ. Version/Full Text Research data DOI PMC
Open Access Green as soon as Postprint is submitted to ZB.
Activity-related breathlessness is twice as common among females as males in the general population and is associated with adverse health outcomes. We tested whether this sex difference is explained by the lower absolute forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) or forced vital capacity (FVC) in females.This was a cross-sectional analysis of 3250 subjects (51% female) aged 38-67 years across 13 countries in the population-based third European Community Respiratory Health Survey. Activity-related breathlessness was measured using the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale. Associations with mMRC were analysed using ordered logistic regression clustering on centre, adjusting for post-bronchodilator spirometry, body mass index, pack-years smoking, cardiopulmonary diseases, depression and level of exercise.Activity-related breathlessness (mMRC ≥1) was twice as common in females (27%) as in males (14%) (odds ratio (OR) 2.21, 95% CI 1.79-2.72). The sex difference was not reduced when controlling for FEV1 % predicted (OR 2.33), but disappeared when controlling for absolute FEV1 (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.69-1.14). Absolute FEV1 explained 98-100% of the sex difference adjusting for confounders. The effect was similar within males and females, when using FVC instead of FEV1 and in healthy never-smokers.The markedly more severe activity-related breathlessness among females in the general population is explained by their smaller spirometric lung volumes.
Impact Factor
Scopus SNIP
Scopus
Cited By
Altmetric
10.569
2.332
21
Tags
Annotations
Special Publikation
Hide on homepage

Edit extra information
Edit own tags
Private
Edit own annotation
Private
Hide on publication lists
on hompage
Mark as special
publikation
Publication type Article: Journal article
Document type Scientific Article
Language english
Publication Year 2017
HGF-reported in Year 2017
ISSN (print) / ISBN 0903-1936
e-ISSN 1399-3003
Quellenangaben Volume: 49, Issue: 5, Pages: , Article Number: 1602047 Supplement: ,
Publisher European Respiratory Society
Publishing Place Sheffield
Reviewing status Peer reviewed
Institute(s) Institute of Epidemiology (EPI)
POF-Topic(s) 30202 - Environmental Health
30503 - Chronic Diseases of the Lung and Allergies
Research field(s) Genetics and Epidemiology
PSP Element(s) G-504000-008
G-503900-001
PubMed ID 28546280
Erfassungsdatum 2017-05-28