Open Access Green as soon as Postprint is submitted to ZB.
		
    Sequential proton boost after standard chemoradiation for high-grade glioma.
        
        Radiother. Oncol. 125, 266-272 (2017)
    
    
    
	    PURPOSE: To retrospectively assess the feasibility and safety of a sequential proton boost following conventional chemoradiation in high-grade glioma (HGG). METHOD AND MATERIALS: Sixty-six consecutive patients with HGG were treated with 50.0 Gy photons (50.0-50.4 Gy) in 2.0 Gy (1.8-2.0 Gy) fractions, followed by a proton boost with 10 Gy equivalent (Gy(RBE)) in 2.0 Gy(RBE) fractions. Patients were matched one to one with 66 patients with HGG undergoing conventional radiation therapy (RT) with 60.0 Gy photons (59.4-60.0 Gy) in 2.0 Gy fractions (1.8-2.0 Gy). Matching criteria were age, WHO grade, Karnofsky's performance status, PTV size, temozolomide therapy (each p > 0.1). The study assessed progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), acute treatment-related toxicity (CTCAE v.4.03) and pseudoprogression (RANO criteria). RESULTS: Median PFS and OS were similar in both treatment groups (bimodality RT, PFS: 8.8 months [2-32 months], OS 19.1 months [4-41 months]; photon-only RT, PFS: 7.2 months [2-39 months], 20.9 months [3-53 months]; p = 0.430 and p = 0.125). The median PTV of the proton boost was significantly smaller than the photon plan PTVs (each p < 0.001). Acute toxicity was mild. Toxicity ≥grade 2 was observed in 6 patients (9%) receiving bimodality RT and 9 patients (14%) receiving photon-only RT. Two types of severe adverse events (CTCAE grade 3) occurred solely in the photon-only group: severe increase in intracranial pressure (5%); and generalized seizures (3%). Pseudoprogression was rare, occurring on average 6 weeks after radiotherapy, and was balanced in both treatment groups (n = 4 each; 8%). CONCLUSION: Delivering a proton boost to significantly smaller target volumes when compared to photon-only plans, yielded comparable progression and survival rates at lower CTCAE grade 3 acute toxicity rates. Pseudoprogression occurred rarely and evenly distributed in both treatment groups. Thus, bimodality RT was at least equivalent regarding outcome and potentially superior with respect to toxicity in patients with HGG. SUMMARY: Treating patients with HGG with 50.0 Gy photons in 2.0 Gy fractions, followed by a proton boost with 10 Gy(RBE) in 2.0 Gy(RBE) fractions, is safe and feasible. Severe radiation-induced acute toxicity and pseudoprogression were rare in both treatment groups. Therefore, in this clinical setting, combined proton radiotherapy might be beneficial in terms of further risk reduction for treatment-related side effects. Interestingly, treatment volume reduction using a proton boost led to comparable survival and progression rates with decreased severe treatment-related toxicity compared to conventional photon radiotherapy.
	
	
      Impact Factor
		Scopus SNIP
		Web of Science
Times Cited
		Times Cited
Scopus
Cited By
		Cited By
Altmetric
		
	    4.328
		1534.000
		11
		18
		
	    Annotations
	    
		
		     
		    
		
	    
	
		
	
	    Special Publikation
	    
		
		     
		
	    
	
	
	
	    Hide on homepage
	    
		
		     
		
	    
	
	
        Publication type
        Article: Journal article
    
 
    
        Document type
        Scientific Article
    
 
     
    
    
        Keywords
        Brain Tumors ; Particle Therapy ; Proton Boost ; Pseudoprogression ; Rbe ; Toxicity; Effectiveness Rbe Values; Carbon Ion Radiotherapy; Glioblastoma-multiforme; Phase-ii; Malignant Gliomas; Clinical-trial; Beam Therapy; Pseudoprogression; Temozolomide; Irradiation
    
 
     
    
    
        Language
        english
    
 
    
        Publication Year
        2017
    
 
     
    
        HGF-reported in Year
        2017
    
 
    
    
        ISSN (print) / ISBN
        0167-8140
    
 
    
        e-ISSN
        1879-0887
    
 
    
     
     
	     
	 
	 
    
        Journal
        Radiotherapy and Oncology
    
 
	
    
        Quellenangaben
        
	    Volume: 125,  
	    Issue: 2,  
	    Pages: 266-272 
	    
	    
	
    
 
    
         
        
            Publisher
            Elsevier
        
 
        
            Publishing Place
            Clare
        
 
	
         
         
         
         
         
	
         
         
         
    
         
         
         
         
         
         
         
    
        Reviewing status
        Peer reviewed
    
 
    
        Institute(s)
        Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM)
    
 
    
        POF-Topic(s)
        30203 - Molecular Targets and Therapies
    
 
    
        Research field(s)
        Radiation Sciences
    
 
    
        PSP Element(s)
        G-501300-001
    
 
     
     	
    
        PubMed ID
        29050959
    
    
    
        WOS ID
        WOS:000418314100013
    
    
        Scopus ID
        85031496938
    
    
        Erfassungsdatum
        2017-11-08