PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München

Siebert, B.R.L.* ; Tanner, R.J.* ; Chartier, J.-L.* ; Agosteo, S.* ; Großwendt, B.* ; Gualdrini, G.* ; Ménard, S.* ; Kodeli, I.* ; Leuthold, G.P. ; Price, R.A.* ; Tagziria, H.* ; Terrissol, M.* ; Zankl, M.

Pitfalls and modelling inconsistencies in computational radiation dosimetry: Lessons learnt from the QUADos intercomparison. Part I: Neutrons and uncertainties.

Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 118, 144-154 (2006)
DOI
Open Access Green as soon as Postprint is submitted to ZB.
The QUADOS EU cost shared action conducted an intercomparison on the usage of numerical methods in radiation protection and dosimetry. The eight problems proposed were intended to test the usage of Monte Carlo and deterministic methods by assessing the accuracy with which the codes are applied and also the methods used to evaluate uncertainty in the answer gained through these methods. The overall objective was to spread good practice through the community and give users information on how to assess the uncertainties associated with their calculated results. © 2006 Oxford University Press.
Altmetric
Additional Metrics?
[➜Log in]
Edit extra informations Login
Publication type Article: Journal article
Document type Scientific Article
ISSN (print) / ISBN 0144-8420
e-ISSN 1742-3406
Journal Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Quellenangaben Volume: 118, Issue: 2, Pages: 144-154 Article Number: , Supplement: ,
Publisher Oxford University Press
Publishing Place Oxford
Reviewing status Peer reviewed
Institute(s) Institute of Radiation Protection (ISS)