Clues to quality of journals
Open Access Policy of Helmholtz Association 2016
CC Licencences
Publication Metrics
Home
Deutsch
New EVA Application
Advanced Search
Browse by ...
Publication overview
Statistics (last 5 years)
OA Publications
Submit Publication
Import publication from...
Report missing publication
Contact persons
Help
Text
Endnote (RIS)
BibTeX
DOI
 |
|
Open Access Green as soon as Postprint is submitted to ZB.
Pitfalls and modelling inconsistencies in computational radiation dosimetry: Lessons learnt from the QUADos intercomparison. Part I: Neutrons and uncertainties.
Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 118, 144-154 (2006)
The QUADOS EU cost shared action conducted an intercomparison on the usage of numerical methods in radiation protection and dosimetry. The eight problems proposed were intended to test the usage of Monte Carlo and deterministic methods by assessing the accuracy with which the codes are applied and also the methods used to evaluate uncertainty in the answer gained through these methods. The overall objective was to spread good practice through the community and give users information on how to assess the uncertainties associated with their calculated results. © 2006 Oxford University Press.
Impact Factor
Scopus SNIP
Web of Science
Times Cited
Times Cited
Scopus
Cited By
Cited By
Altmetric
0.490
0.777
2
6
Annotations
Special Publikation
Hide on homepage
Publication type
Article: Journal article
Document type
Scientific Article
Language
english
Publication Year
2006
HGF-reported in Year
0
ISSN (print) / ISBN
0144-8420
e-ISSN
1742-3406
Journal
Radiation Protection Dosimetry
Quellenangaben
Volume: 118,
Issue: 2,
Pages: 144-154
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publishing Place
Oxford
Reviewing status
Peer reviewed
Institute(s)
Institute of Radiation Protection (ISS)
POF-Topic(s)
30504 - Mechanisms of Genetic and Environmental Influences on Health and Disease
Research field(s)
Radiation Sciences
PSP Element(s)
G-501100-008
Scopus ID
33745728218
Erfassungsdatum
2006-09-26