Open Access Green as soon as Postprint is submitted to ZB.
Financial incentives in the German Statutory Health Insurance: New findings, new questions.
Health Policy 96, 51-56 (2010)
OBJECTIVES: This paper presents findings of a mandatory three-year evaluation of a prevention bonus scheme offered in the German Statutory Health Insurance (SHI). Its objective is to describe the rationale behind the programs, analyze their financial impact and discuss their implications on potentially conflicting goals on solidarity and competition. METHODS: The analysis included 70,429 insured enrolled in a prevention bonus program in a cohort study. The intervention group and their matched controls were followed for a three-year period. Matching was performed as nearest neighbor matching. The economic analysis comprised all costs relevant for Sickness Funds (SF) in the SHI and was carried out from a SHI perspective. Differences in cost trends between the intervention and the control group were examined applying the paired t-test. RESULTS: Regarding mean costs there was a significant difference between the two groups of euro177.48 (90% CI [euro149.73; euro205.24]) in favor of the intervention group. If program costs were considered cost reductions of euro100.88 (90% CI [euro73.12; euro128.63]) were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: The uptake of a prevention bonus program led to cost reductions in the intervention group compared to the control group even when program costs were considered. However, the results must be interpreted with caution as in addition to financial aspects, socio-economic and health-status, selection bias and the function and use of bonus programs as marketing tools, as well as their long-term sustainability should be considered in future assessments.
Altmetric
Additional Metrics?
Edit extra informations
Login
Publication type
Article: Journal article
Document type
Scientific Article
Keywords
Financing healthcare; Incentives; Prevention; Solidarity; Competition
ISSN (print) / ISBN
0168-8510
e-ISSN
1872-6054
Journal
Health Policy
Quellenangaben
Volume: 96,
Issue: 1,
Pages: 51-56
Publisher
Elsevier
Reviewing status
Peer reviewed