PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München

Fritsche, A. ; Wagner, R. ; Heni, M. ; Kantartzis, K. ; Machann, J. ; Schick, F.* ; Lehmann, R. ; Peter, A. ; Dannecker, C. ; Fritsche, L. ; Valenta, V. ; Nawroth, P.P. ; Kopf, S.* ; Pfeiffer, A.F.* ; Kabisch, S.* ; Dambeck, U.* ; Stumvoll, M.* ; Blüher, M.* ; Birkenfeld, A.L.* ; Schwarz, P.* ; Hauner, H.* ; Clavel, J.* ; Seißler, J.* ; Lechner, A.* ; Müssig, K.* ; Weber, K.* ; Laxy, M. ; Bornstein, S.* ; Schürmann, A.* ; Roden, M.* ; Hrabě de Angelis, M. ; Stefan, N. ; Häring, H.-U.

Different effects of lifestyle intervention in high- and low-risk prediabetes.

Diabetes 70, 2785-2795:2785-2795 (2021)
Publ. Version/Full Text Postprint DOI PMC
Open Access Green
Lifestyle intervention (LI) can prevent type 2 diabetes, but response to LI varies depending on risk subphenotypes. We tested if prediabetic individuals with low risk benefit from conventional LI and individuals with high risk benefit from an intensification of LI in a multi-center randomized controlled intervention over 12 months with 2 years follow up. 1105 prediabetic individuals based on ADA glucose criteria were stratified into a high- and low-risk phenotype, based on previously described thresholds of insulin secretion, insulin sensitivity and liver fat content. Low-risk individuals were randomly assigned to conventional LI according to the DPP protocol or control (1:1), high-risk individuals to conventional or intensified LI with doubling of required exercise (1:1). A total of 908 (82%) participants completed the study. In high-risk individuals, the difference between conventional and intensified LI in post-challenge glucose change was -0.29 mmol/l [CI:-0.54;-0.04], p=0.025. Liver fat (-1.34 percentage points [CI:-2.17;-0.50], p=0.002) and cardiovascular risk (-1.82[CI:-3.13-0.50],p=0.007) underwent larger reductions with intensified than with conventional LI. During a follow up of 3 years, intensified compared to conventional LI had a higher probability to normalize glucose tolerance (p=0.008). In conclusion, it is possible in high-risk individuals with prediabetes to improve glycemic and cardiometabolic outcomes by intensification of LI. Individualized, risk-phenotype-based LI may be beneficial for the prevention of diabetes.
Altmetric
Additional Metrics?
[➜Log in]
Edit extra informations Login
Publication type Article: Journal article
Document type Scientific Article
Corresponding Author
Keywords Diabetes Prevention Program; Impaired Glucose-tolerance; Insulin-secretion; Fat Quantification; Weight-loss; Follow-up; Type-2; Pathogenesis; Individuals; Sensitivity
ISSN (print) / ISBN 0012-1797
e-ISSN 1939-327X
Journal Diabetes
Quellenangaben Volume: 70, Issue: 12, Pages: 2785-2795 Article Number: 2785-2795 Supplement: ,
Publisher American Diabetes Association
Publishing Place Alexandria, VA.
Non-patent literature Publications
Reviewing status Peer reviewed
Institute(s) Institute of Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases (IDM)
Institute of Diabetes and Cancer (IDC)
Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management (IGM)
Institute of Experimental Genetics (IEG)
Grants German Federal Ministry for Education and Research