PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München: Reassessment of candidate gene studies for idiopathic restless legs syndrome in a large GWAS dataset of European ancestry.

Information

Clues to quality of journals

Open Access Policy of Helmholtz Association 2016

CC Licencences

Publication Metrics

Navigation

Home

Deutsch

EVA: Electronic Publishing

New EVA Application

Research

Advanced Search

Browse by ...

... HMGU-Authors/Consortia

... Organizational Structure

... Journal

... Publication Type

... Research Data

... Arbeitsgruppen

... Publication Year

Publication overview

Statistics

Statistics (last 5 years)

OA Publications

Publish

Submit Publication

Import publication from...

...EVA

Report missing publication

Highlights

Support & Contact

Contact persons

Help

Data protection

Helmholtz Open Science

JANE Journal Estimator

SHERPA/RoMEO

DOAJ

Export:

Text

Endnote (RIS) BIB

BibTeX

International EU-RLS-GENE Consortium (Schormair, B.) ; Zhao, C. ; Salminen, A.V. ; International EU-RLS-GENE Consortium (Oexle, K.) ; International EU-RLS-GENE Consortium (Winkelmann, J.) ; International EU-RLS-GENE Consortium (Oertel, W.H.) ; International EU-RLS-GENE Consortium (Gieger, C.) ; International EU-RLS-GENE Consortium (Peters, A.)

Reassessment of candidate gene studies for idiopathic restless legs syndrome in a large GWAS dataset of European ancestry.

Sleep 45:zsac098 (2022)

Publ. Version/Full Text

Postprint

DOI

PMC

	Open Access Green

Abstract
Metrics
Extra information

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Several candidate gene studies have been published for idiopathic restless legs syndrome (RLS) in populations of European ancestry, but the reported associations have not been confirmed in independent samples. Our aim was to reassess these findings in a large case-control dataset in order to evaluate their validity. METHODS: We screened PubMed for RLS candidate gene studies. We used the genome-wide association study (GWAS) dataset of the International-EU-RLS-GENE-Consortium as our replication sample, which provided genome-wide single variant association data based on at most 17,220 individuals of European ancestry. We performed additional gene-based tests using the software MAGMA and assessed the power of our study using the genpwr R package. RESULTS: We identified 14 studies conducted in European samples which assessed 45 variants in 27 genes of which five variants had been reported as significantly associated. None of these individual variants were replicated in our GWAS-based reassessment (nominal p > 0.05) and gene-based tests for the respective five genes ADH1B, GABRR3, HMOX1, MAOA, and VDR, were also non-significant (nominal p > 0.05). Our replication dataset was well-powered to detect the reported effects, even when adjusting for effect size overestimation due to winner's curse. Power estimates were close to 100% for all variants. CONCLUSION: In summary, none of the significant single variant associations from candidate gene studies were confirmed in our GWAS dataset. Therefore, these associations were likely false-positive. Our observations emphasize the need for large sample sizes and stringent significance thresholds in future association studies for RLS.

Impact Factor

Scopus SNIP

Scopus
Cited By

Altmetric

6.313

0.000