PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München: Who can Submit an Excellent Review for this Manuscript in the Next 30 Days?

Information

Clues to quality of journals

Open Access Policy of Helmholtz Association 2016

CC Licencences

Publication Metrics

Navigation

Home

Deutsch

Research

Advanced Search

Browse by ...

... HMGU-Authors/Consortia

... Organizational Structure

... Journal

... Publication Type

... Research Data

... Arbeitsgruppen

... Publication Year

Publication overview

Statistics

Statistics (last 5 years)

OA Publications

Publish

Submit Publication

Import publication from...

...EVA

Report missing publication

Highlights

Support & Contact

Contact persons

Help

Data protection

Helmholtz Open Science

JANE Journal Estimator

SHERPA/RoMEO

DOAJ

Export:

Text

Endnote (RIS) BIB

BibTeX

Alhoori, H.* ; Fox, E.A.* ; Frommholz, I.* ; Liu, H.* ; Coupette, C.* ; Rieck, B. ; Ghosal, T.* ; Wu, J.*

Who can Submit an Excellent Review for this Manuscript in the Next 30 Days? - Peer Reviewing in the Age of Overload.

In: (Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 26-30 June 2023, Santa Fe, USA). 2023. 319-320 (Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries ; 2023-June)

Postprint

DOI

Abstract
Metrics
Extra information

With millions of research articles published yearly, the peer review process is in danger of collapsing, especially in 'hot' areas with popular conferences. Challenges arise from the large number of manuscripts submitted, skyrocketing use of preprint archives and institutional repositories, problems regarding the identification and availability of experts, conflicts of interest, and bias in reviewing. Such issues can affect the integrity of the reviewing process as well as the timeliness, quality, credibility, and reproducibility of research articles. Several solutions and systems have been suggested, but none work well, and neither authors nor editors are happy with how long it takes to complete reviewing the submitted research. This panel addresses these challenges and potential solutions, including digital libraries that recommend reviewers, as well as broader issues like opportunities for identifying peer reviewers for scholarly journals by engaging doctoral students and postdocs, as well as those who recently completed their Ph.D.

Altmetric