PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München

Kimball, B.A.* ; Thorp, K.R.* ; Boote, K.J.* ; Stockle, C.* ; Suyker, A.E.* ; Evett, S.R.* ; Brauer, D.K.* ; Coyle, G.G.* ; Copeland, K.S.* ; Marek, G.W.* ; Colaizzi, P.D.* ; Acutis, M.* ; Archontoulis, S.* ; Babacar, F.* ; Barcza, Z.* ; Basso, B.* ; Bertuzzi, P.* ; Migliorati, M.D.A.* ; Dumont, B.* ; Durand, J.L.* ; Fodor, N.* ; Gaiser, T.* ; Gayler, S.* ; Grant, R.* ; Guan, K.* ; Hoogenboom, G.* ; Jiang, Q.* ; Kim, S.H.* ; Kisekka, I.* ; Lizaso, J.* ; Perego, A.* ; Peng, B.* ; Priesack, E. ; Qi, Z.* ; Shelia, V.* ; Srivastava, A.K.* ; Timlin, D.* ; Webber, H.* ; Weber, T.* ; Williams, K.* ; Viswanathan, M.* ; Zhou, W.*

Simulation of soil temperature under maize: An inter-comparison among 33 maize models.

Agric. For. Meteorol. 351:110003 (2024)
DOI
Open Access Green as soon as Postprint is submitted to ZB.
Accurate simulation of soil temperature can help improve the accuracy of crop growth models by improving the predictions of soil processes like seed germination, decomposition, nitrification, evaporation, and carbon sequestration. To assess how well such models can simulate soil temperature, herein we present results of an inter-comparison study of 33 maize (Zea mays L.) growth models. Among the 33 models, four of the modeling groups contributed results using differing algorithms or “flavors” to simulate evapotranspiration within the same overall model family. The study used comprehensive datasets from two sites - Mead, Nebraska, USA and Bushland, Texas, USA wherein soil temperature was measured continually at several depths. The range of simulated soil temperatures was large (about 10–15 °C) from the coolest to warmest models across whole growing seasons from bare soil to full canopy and at both shallow and deeper depths. Within model families, there were no significant differences among their simulations of soil temperature due to their differing evapotranspiration method “flavors”, so root-mean-square-errors (RMSE) were averaged within families, which reduced the number of soil temperature model families to 13. The model family RMSEs averaged over all 20 treatment-years and 2 depths ranged from about 1.5 to 5.1 °C. The six models with the lowest RMSEs were APSIM, ecosys, JULES, Expert-N, SLFT, and MaizSim. Five of these best models used a numerical iterative approach to simulate soil temperature, which entailed using an energy balance on each soil layer. whereby the change in heat storage during a time step equals the difference between the heat flow into and that out of the layer. Further improvements in the best models for simulating soil temperature might be possible with the incorporation of more recently improved routines for simulating soil thermal conductivity than the older routines now in use by the models.
Altmetric
Additional Metrics?
Edit extra informations Login
Publication type Article: Journal article
Document type Scientific Article
Corresponding Author
Keywords Crop Models ; Maize ; Prediction ; Simulation ; Soil Heat Flux ; Soil Temperature; Thermal-conductivity; Irrigated Maize; Water; Crop; Evapotranspiration; Growth; Energy; Calibration; Evaporation; Exchange
ISSN (print) / ISBN 0168-1923
e-ISSN 1873-2240
Quellenangaben Volume: 351, Issue: , Pages: , Article Number: 110003 Supplement: ,
Publisher Elsevier
Publishing Place Amsterdam [u.a.]
Non-patent literature Publications
Reviewing status Peer reviewed