Assfalg, V.* ; Stocker, F.* ; Hüser, N.* ; Hartmann, D.* ; Matevossian, E.* ; van Bruchem, M.* ; Vogelaar, S.* ; Renders, L.* ; Schmaderer, C.* ; Margreiter, C.* ; Deák, A.* ; Messner, F.* ; Kammer, M.* ; Ysebaert, D.* ; Jacobs-Tulleneers-Thevissen, D.* ; Michalski, D.* ; van Laecke, S.* ; Gillard, P.* ; Kahl, A.* ; Viebahn, R.* ; Riediger, C.* ; Jänigen, B.* ; Schmelzle, M.* ; von Samson-Himmelstjerna, F.A.* ; Stippel, D.* ; Harth, A.* ; Nitschké, M.J.E.* ; Koliogiannis, D.* ; Pascher, A.* ; Hoyer, J.* ; Weinmann-Menke, J.* ; Schiffer, M.* ; Hinz, S.* ; Nadalin, S.* ; Lopau, K.* ; Huurman, V.* ; Arnol, M.* ; Miller, G.
     
    
        
Combined pancreas-kidney transplantation after rescue allocation: The eurotransplant experience: A retrospective multicenter outcome analysis.
    
    
        
    
    
        
        Transplantation 109, 1437-1448 (2025)
    
    
 	
    
	
	  DOI
 DOI
	  PMC
 PMC
		
		
			Open Access Green as soon as Postprint is submitted to ZB.
		
     
    
      
      
	
	    BACKGROUND: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) is the therapy of choice for selected patients with complicated type 1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal disease. Pancreas rescue allocation was implemented in Eurotransplant allocation algorithms to increase organ utilization, concurrently facilitating transplantation of supposedly inferior quality organs. The aim of this study was to examine whether outcomes of SPKT after rescue allocation, which can either be recipient-oriented extended allocation or competitive rescue allocation, were as good as after standard allocation. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter analysis of 1504 SPKT performed from 2013 to 2021 evaluated outcomes by allocation type considering survival of patients, pancreas grafts, and kidney grafts. Multivariable analyses further explored the influence of specific donor-, recipient-, and transplant-related variables on outcomes. RESULTS: Multivariable analyses showed no significant differences in SPKT outcome for standard allocation versus either rescue allocation type regarding patient, pancreas graft, and kidney graft survival. Rescue allocation organ donors were older, had higher body mass index, and were more likely to smoke. Rescue allocation had fewer HLA matches. Cold ischemic times of both pancreas and kidneys were longer in competitive rescue allocation but not in recipient-oriented extended allocation. Rescue allocation pancreas recipients had shorter waiting times. Multivariable analyses showed inferior pancreas and kidney graft survival for higher donor age. Higher recipient age correlated with higher mortality despite better pancreas graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: SPKT outcome after rescue allocation is comparable with standard allocation in both patient and graft survival. Age of both donors and recipients essentially influences the success of SPKT.
	
	
	    
	
       
      
	
	    
		Impact Factor
		Scopus SNIP
		Web of Science
Times Cited
		Scopus
Cited By
		Altmetric
		
	     
	    
	 
       
      
     
    
        Publication type
        Article: Journal article
    
 
    
        Document type
        Scientific Article
    
 
    
        Thesis type
        
    
 
    
        Editors
        
    
    
        Keywords
        
    
 
    
        Keywords plus
        
    
 
    
    
        Language
        english
    
 
    
        Publication Year
        2025
    
 
    
        Prepublished in Year
        0
    
 
    
        HGF-reported in Year
        2025
    
 
    
    
        ISSN (print) / ISBN
        0041-1337
    
 
    
        e-ISSN
        1534-0608
    
 
    
        ISBN
        
    
    
        Book Volume Title
        
    
 
    
        Conference Title
        
    
 
	
        Conference Date
        
    
     
	
        Conference Location
        
    
 
	
        Proceedings Title
        
    
 
     
	
    
        Quellenangaben
        
	    Volume: 109,  
	    Issue: 8,  
	    Pages: 1437-1448 
	    Article Number: ,  
	    Supplement: ,  
	
    
 
    
        
            Series
            
        
 
        
            Publisher
            Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
        
 
        
            Publishing Place
            
        
 
	
        
            Day of Oral Examination
            0000-00-00
        
 
        
            Advisor
            
        
 
        
            Referee
            
        
 
        
            Examiner
            
        
 
        
            Topic
            
        
 
	
        
            University
            
        
 
        
            University place
            
        
 
        
            Faculty
            
        
 
    
        
            Publication date
            0000-00-00
        
 
         
        
            Application date
            0000-00-00
        
 
        
            Patent owner
            
        
 
        
            Further owners
            
        
 
        
            Application country
            
        
 
        
            Patent priority
            
        
 
    
        Reviewing status
        Peer reviewed
    
 
    
        Institute(s)
        CF Statistical Consulting (CF-STATCON)
    
 
    
        POF-Topic(s)
        30505 - New Technologies for Biomedical Discoveries
    
 
    
        Research field(s)
        Enabling and Novel Technologies
    
 
    
        PSP Element(s)
        A-632200-001
    
 
    
        Grants
        
    
 
    
        Copyright
        
    
 	
    
    
    
    
    
        Erfassungsdatum
        2025-05-06