PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München

Model-based exploration is measurable across tasks but not linked to personality and psychiatric assessments.

Sci. Rep. 15:27479 (2025)
Postprint Research data DOI PMC
Open Access Gold
Creative Commons Lizenzvertrag
An increasing number of studies have used multi-armed bandit tasks to investigate individual differences in exploration behavior. However, the psychometric properties of exploration measures remain unexplored. We examine the test-retest reliability, convergent, divergent, and external validity of model-based estimates of exploration strategies using three canonical paradigms. Our results revealed poor to moderate reliability, with minimal correlations for the same strategy across tasks. We then provide actionable recommendations for how to improve reliability and convergence across tasks: Simplifying common computational models enabled us to identify two convergently valid latent factors representing value-guided and directed exploration. Still, these factors showed neither a significant correlation with self-reported exploration tendencies nor with mood fluctuations, symptoms of anxiety, and depression. The exploration factors were, however, highly correlated with working memory capacity, questioning whether they provide additional information beyond performance-related constructs. To improve future research, we suggest simplifying common computational models and using multiple tasks to more accurately measure exploration strategies and mitigate spurious correlations arising from task-specific factors.
Impact Factor
Scopus SNIP
Altmetric
3.900
0.000
Tags
Annotations
Special Publikation
Hide on homepage

Edit extra information
Edit own tags
Private
Edit own annotation
Private
Hide on publication lists
on hompage
Mark as special
publikation
Publication type Article: Journal article
Document type Scientific Article
Keywords Exploration Strategies ; Exploration–exploitation ; Few-armed Bandits ; Reliability ; Validity; Working-memory Capacity; Individual-differences; Information; Validation
Language english
Publication Year 2025
HGF-reported in Year 2025
ISSN (print) / ISBN 2045-2322
e-ISSN 2045-2322
Quellenangaben Volume: 15, Issue: 1, Pages: , Article Number: 27479 Supplement: ,
Publisher Nature Publishing Group
Publishing Place London
Reviewing status Peer reviewed
Institute(s) Institute of AI for Health (AIH)
POF-Topic(s) 30205 - Bioengineering and Digital Health
Research field(s) Enabling and Novel Technologies
PSP Element(s) G-540011-001
Grants ERC Starting Grant
Helmholtz Munich, a Jacobs Research Fellowship
Max Planck Society
Helmholtz Zentrum Mnchen - Deutsches Forschungszentrum fr Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH) (4209)
Scopus ID 105011960404
PubMed ID 40721436
Erfassungsdatum 2025-08-01