PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München

Faggionato, D.* ; Muñoz-García, M.* ; Kostić, T.* ; Ferrari, M.L.* ; Vonaesch, P.* ; Poyet, M.* ; Dutrieux, C.* ; Ryan, M.J.* ; Djeddour, D.* ; Stumptner, C.* ; Varese, G.C.* ; Zuzuarregui, A.* ; Groussin, M.* ; Schloter, M. ; Finn, R.D.* ; Haas, A.* ; Probert, I.* ; Verkley, G.* ; Overmann, J.* ; Scholz, A.H.*

Policy in practice: How to “do” the Nagoya Protocol: Common misconceptions, challenges and best practices for access and benefit-sharing compliance.

Sustain. Microbio., DOI: 10.1093/sumbio/qvag007 (2026)
Postprint DOI
Open Access Gold as soon as Publ. Version/Full Text is submitted to ZB.
The Nagoya Protocol establishes an international framework for access-and-benefit-sharing (ABS)including for microbial research. Yet many microbiologists have only a vague understanding of what theNP requires and are unsure how to navigate its complexities, despite the fact that non-compliance canhave significant legal consequences and far-reaching reputational and legal impacts. This paperdiscusses common misconceptions and practical challenges that microbiologists may encounter whencomplying with the Nagoya Protocol and a step-by-step guide on how to “do” the Nagoya Protocol. Wepresent three case studies to showcase real-life experiences and provide best practice principles foraccess-and-benefit-sharing while fostering biodiversity conservation, equitable collaboration, andsustainable innovation.
Altmetric
Additional Metrics?
[➜Log in]
Edit extra informations Login
Publication type Article: Journal article
Document type Review
Keywords Best Practice ; Protocol (science) ; Compliance (psychology) ; Sustainability ; Good Practice ; Transparency (behavior)
ISSN (print) / ISBN 2755-1970
e-ISSN 2755-1970
Journal Sustainable Microbiology
Publisher Oxford University Press
Reviewing status Peer reviewed
Institute(s) Research Unit Comparative Microbiome Analysis (COMI)