PuSH - Publikationsserver des Helmholtz Zentrums München: Can inaccuracy of reported parental history of diabetes explain the maternal transmission hypothesis for diabetes?

Informationen

Hinweise zu Qualitätskriterien von Zeitschriften

Open-Access-Richtlinie der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft 2016

CC Licencences

Metriken für Publikationen

Navigation

Startseite

English

EVA: Veröffentlichen

Neuer EVA Antrag

Recherche

Erweiterte Suche

Durchblättern nach ...

... HMGU-Autoren/Konsortien

... Organisationsstruktur

... Zeitschriften

... Publikationstypen

... Forschungsdaten

... Arbeitsgruppen

... Erscheinungsjahr

Publikationen im Überblick

Statistik

HGF Fortschrittsbericht

OA Publikationen

Eintragen

Neue Publikation eintragen

Neue Publikation holen aus...

...EVA

Fehlende Publikation melden

Highlights

Suche

Hilfe & Kontakt

Ansprechpartner

Hilfe

Datenschutz

Helmholtz Open Science

Bibliometrische Indikatoren

SHERPA/RoMEO

DOAJ

Export:

Text

Endnote (RIS) BIB

BibTeX

Thorand, B. ; Liese, A.D.* ; Metzger, M.-H. ; Reitmeir, P. ; Schneider, A.E. ; Löwel, H.

Can inaccuracy of reported parental history of diabetes explain the maternal transmission hypothesis for diabetes?

Int. J. Epidemiol. 30, 1084-1089 (2001)

Verlagsversion Volltext

DOI

PMC

	Closed

Open Access Green möglich sobald Postprint bei der ZB eingereicht worden ist.

Abstract
Metriken
Zusatzinfos

BACKGROUND: The mode of inheritance of type 2 diabetes mellitus is still under discussion. Several studies have suggested an excess maternal transmission, however, more recent studies could not always confirm these findings. METHODS: We investigated the frequency of a maternal and paternal history of diabetes among diabetic and non-diabetic subjects and assessed the association between diabetes and a parental history of diabetes among participants of the MONICA Augsburg study. As an extension to previous studies, unknown parental status was taken into account. RESULTS: Of the 542 diabetic probands, 25.3% reported a positive maternal history of diabetes and 10.9% reported a positive paternal history of diabetes. Among the 12,209 non-diabetic participants a positive maternal history was also more common than a positive paternal history (12.5% versus 7.1%). Conversely, an unknown paternal status was more common than an unknown maternal status in both groups (diabetic subjects: 27.9% versus 16.8%, non-diabetic subjects: 16.8% versus 8.4%). Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for the association between a parental history of diabetes and diabetes status were similar for a positive maternal (OR = 2.9, 95% CI : 2.3-3.6) and paternal history (OR = 2.8, 95% CI : 2.1-3.8) and for an unknown maternal (OR = 1.3, 95% CI : 1.0-1.8) and paternal history (OR = 1.5, 95% CI : 1.2-1.9). CONCLUSION: Our findings do not support a strong excess maternal transmission of diabetes. Epidemiological biases and failure to account for 'don't know' responses may in part explain the previously observed predominance of a maternal history of diabetes.

Impact Factor

Scopus SNIP

Web of Science
Times Cited

Scopus
Cited By

Altmetric

0.000