Open Access Green möglich sobald Postprint bei der ZB eingereicht worden ist.
Is there a gain from "chance-corrected" measures of diagnostic validity?
J. Clin. Epidemiol. 50, 117-120 (1997)
Several authors have proposed alternatives to sensitivity and specificity which they recommend as so-called "chance-corrected" versions of these parameters of diagnostic validity. We argue that these new measures have some undesirable properties in comparison with the established measures and no substantial advantages. In particular, the extension of this concept to chance-corrected ROC curves is shown to be less useful than classical ROC analysis.
Impact Factor
Scopus SNIP
Web of Science
Times Cited
Times Cited
Scopus
Cited By
Cited By
Altmetric
0.000
0.000
2
3
Anmerkungen
Besondere Publikation
Auf Hompepage verbergern
Publikationstyp
Artikel: Journalartikel
Dokumenttyp
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Schlagwörter
diagnostic test; validity; chance-correction; ROC; kappa; sensitivity; AGREEMENT; SENSITIVITY; SPECIFICITY; KAPPA; TESTS
Sprache
englisch
Veröffentlichungsjahr
1997
HGF-Berichtsjahr
0
ISSN (print) / ISBN
0895-4356
e-ISSN
0895-4356
Zeitschrift
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Quellenangaben
Band: 50,
Heft: 1,
Seiten: 117-120
Verlag
Elsevier
Begutachtungsstatus
Peer reviewed
Institut(e)
Department for Medical Information Systems (MEDIS)
Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management (IGM)
Institute of Health Economics and Health Care Management (IGM)
PubMed ID
9048696
WOS ID
WOS:A1997WF66800013
Scopus ID
0031039358
Erfassungsdatum
1997-12-31