PuSH - Publikationsserver des Helmholtz Zentrums München: More is not always better: Local models provide accurate predictions of spectral properties of porphyrins.

Informationen

Hinweise zu Qualitätskriterien von Zeitschriften

Open-Access-Richtlinie der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft 2016

CC Licencences

Metriken für Publikationen

Navigation

Startseite

English

EVA: Veröffentlichen

Neuer EVA Antrag

Recherche

Erweiterte Suche

Durchblättern nach ...

... HMGU-Autoren/Konsortien

... Organisationsstruktur

... Zeitschriften

... Publikationstypen

... Forschungsdaten

... Arbeitsgruppen

... Erscheinungsjahr

Publikationen im Überblick

Statistik

HGF Fortschrittsbericht

OA Publikationen

Eintragen

Neue Publikation eintragen

Neue Publikation holen aus...

...EVA

Fehlende Publikation melden

Highlights

Suche

Hilfe & Kontakt

Ansprechpartner

Hilfe

Datenschutz

Helmholtz Open Science

Bibliometrische Indikatoren

SHERPA/RoMEO

DOAJ

Export:

Text

Endnote (RIS) BIB

BibTeX

Rusanov, A.I.* ; Dmitrieva, O.A.* ; Mamardashvili, N.Z.* ; Tetko, I.V.

More is not always better: Local models provide accurate predictions of spectral properties of porphyrins.

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23:1201 (2022)

Verlagsversion

Forschungsdaten

DOI

PMC

	Open Access Gold

Abstract
Metriken
Zusatzinfos

The development of new functional materials based on porphyrins requires fast and accurate prediction of their spectral properties. The available models in the literature for absorption wavelength and extinction coefficient of the Soret band have low accuracy for this class of compounds. We collected spectral data for porphyrins to extend the literature set and compared the performance of global and local models for their modelling using different machine learning methods. Interestingly, extension of the public database contributed models with lower accuracies compared to the models, which we built using porphyrins only. The later model calculated acceptable RMSE = 2.26 for prediction of the absorption band of 335 porphyrins synthesized in our laboratory, but had a low accuracy (RMSE = 0.52) for extinction coefficient. A development of models using only compounds from our laboratory significantly decreased errors for these compounds (RMSE = 0.5 and 0.042 for absorption band and extinction coefficient, respectively), but limited their applicability only to these homologous series. When developing models, one should clearly keep in mind their potential use and select a strategy that could contribute the most accurate predictions for the target application. The models and data are publicly available.

Impact Factor

Scopus SNIP

Scopus
Cited By

Altmetric

6.208

1.441