PuSH - Publikationsserver des Helmholtz Zentrums München

Ziehfreund, S.* ; Tizek, L.* ; Hangel, N.* ; Fritzsche, M.C.* ; Weidinger, S.* ; Smith, C.* ; Bryce, P.J.* ; Greco, D.* ; van den Bogaard, E.H.* ; Flohr, C.* ; Rastrick, J.* ; Eyerich, S. ; Buyx, A.* ; Conrad, C.* ; Eyerich, K.* ; Zink, A.*

Requirements and expectations of high-quality biomarkers for atopic dermatitis and psoriasis in 2021 - a two-round Delphi survey among international experts.

J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 36, 1467-1476 (2022)
Verlagsversion DOI PMC
Open Access Hybrid
Creative Commons Lizenzvertrag
BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammatory skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis (PSO) present major challenges in health care. Thus, biomarkers to identify disease trajectories and response to treatments to improve the lives of affected individuals warrant great research consideration. The requirements that these biomarkers must fulfill for use as practical clinical tools have not yet been adequately investigated. AIM: To identify the core elements of high-quality AD and PSO biomarkers to prepare recommendations for current biomarker research. METHOD: A cross-sectional two-round Delphi survey was conducted from August to October 2019 and October to November 2020. All participants were members of the BIOMAP project, an EU-funded consortium of clinicians, researchers, patient organizations and pharmaceutical industry partners. The first round consisted of three open-ended questions. Responses were qualitatively analyzed, and 26 closed statements were developed. For the second round, 'agreement' was assumed when the responses of ≥70% of the participants were ≥5 points on a 7-point Likert scale for each statement. Priority classification was based on mean scores (<20th-percentile=low, 20th-60th-percentile=medium, >60th-percentile=high). RESULTS: Twenty-one and twenty-six individuals participated in round one and two, respectively. From 26 statements that were included in round 2, 18 achieved agreement (8 concerning the performance, 8 for the purpose, and 2 on current obstacles). Seven statements were classified as high priority, e.g., those concerning reliability, clinical validity, a high positive predictive value, prediction of the therapeutic response, and disease progression. Another seven statements were assigned medium priority, e.g., those about analytical validity, prediction of comorbidities, and therapeutic algorithm. Low priority included four statements, like those concerning cost-effectiveness and prediction of disease flares. CONCLUSION: The core requirements that experts agreed on being essential for high-quality AD and PSO biomarkers, require rapid validation. Biomarkers can therefore be assessed based on these prioritized requirements.
Impact Factor
Scopus SNIP
Altmetric
9.228
0.000
Tags
Anmerkungen
Besondere Publikation
Auf Hompepage verbergern

Zusatzinfos bearbeiten
Eigene Tags bearbeiten
Privat
Eigene Anmerkung bearbeiten
Privat
Auf Publikationslisten für
Homepage nicht anzeigen
Als besondere Publikation
markieren
Publikationstyp Artikel: Journalartikel
Dokumenttyp Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Sprache englisch
Veröffentlichungsjahr 2022
HGF-Berichtsjahr 2022
ISSN (print) / ISBN 0926-9959
e-ISSN 1468-3083
Quellenangaben Band: 36, Heft: 9, Seiten: 1467-1476 Artikelnummer: , Supplement: ,
Verlag Wiley
Begutachtungsstatus Peer reviewed
POF Topic(s) 30202 - Environmental Health
Forschungsfeld(er) Allergy
PSP-Element(e) G-505490-001
Förderungen Sanofi Genzyme
European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
GlaxoSmithKline
Pfizer
Sanofi Deutschland GmbH
BIOMAP
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Innovative Medicines Initiative
Swedish Orphan Biovitrum
PubMed ID 35470457
Erfassungsdatum 2022-08-31