PuSH - Publikationsserver des Helmholtz Zentrums München: Critical assessment of chromatographic metadata in publicly available metabolomics data repositories.

Informationen

Hinweise zu Qualitätskriterien von Zeitschriften

Open-Access-Richtlinie der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft 2016

CC Licencences

Metriken für Publikationen

Navigation

Startseite

English

EVA: Veröffentlichen

Neuer EVA Antrag

Recherche

Erweiterte Suche

Durchblättern nach ...

... HMGU-Autoren/Konsortien

... Organisationsstruktur

... Zeitschriften

... Publikationstypen

... Forschungsdaten

... Arbeitsgruppen

... Erscheinungsjahr

Publikationen im Überblick

Statistik

HGF Fortschrittsbericht

OA Publikationen

Eintragen

Neue Publikation eintragen

Neue Publikation holen aus...

...EVA

Fehlende Publikation melden

Highlights

Suche

Hilfe & Kontakt

Ansprechpartner

Hilfe

Datenschutz

Helmholtz Open Science

Bibliometrische Indikatoren

SHERPA/RoMEO

DOAJ

Export:

Text

Endnote (RIS) BIB

BibTeX

Harrieder, E.-M. ; Kretschmer, F.* ; Dunn, W.* ; Böcker, S.* ; Witting, M.

Critical assessment of chromatographic metadata in publicly available metabolomics data repositories.

Metabolomics 18:97 (2022)

Verlagsversion

Forschungsdaten

DOI

PMC

	Open Access Hybrid

Abstract
Metriken
Zusatzinfos

Introduction: The structural identification of metabolites represents one of the current bottlenecks in non-targeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS) based metabolomics. The Metabolomics Standard Initiative has developed a multilevel system to report confidence in metabolite identification, which involves the use of MS, MS/MS and orthogonal data. Limitations due to similar or same fragmentation pattern (e.g. isomeric compounds) can be overcome by the additional orthogonal information of the retention time (RT), since it is a system property that is different for each chromatographic setup. Objectives: In contrast to MS data, sharing of RT data is not as widespread. The quality of data and its (re-)useability depend very much on the quality of the metadata. We aimed to evaluate the coverage and quality of this metadata from public metabolomics repositories. Methods: We acquired an overview on the current reporting of chromatographic separation conditions. For this purpose, we defined the following information as important details that have to be provided: column name and dimension, flow rate, temperature, composition of eluents and gradient. Results: We found that 70% of descriptions of the chromatographic setups are incomplete (according to our definition) and an additional 10% of the descriptions contained ambiguous and/or incorrect information. Accordingly, only about 20% of the descriptions allow further (re-)use of the data, e.g. for RT prediction. Therefore, we have started to develop a unified and standardized notation for chromatographic metadata with detailed and specific description of eluents, columns and gradients. Conclusion: Reporting of chromatographic metadata is currently not unified. Our recommended suggestions for metadata reporting will enable more standardization and automatization in future reporting.

Impact Factor

Scopus SNIP

Altmetric

4.747

1.160