Chen, J.* ; Braun, D.* ; Christidis, T.* ; Cork, M.J.* ; Rodopoulou, S.* ; Samoli, E.* ; Stafoggia, M.* ; Wolf, K. ; Wu, X.* ; Yuchi, W.* ; Andersen, Z.J.* ; Atkinson, R.* ; Bauwelinck, M.* ; de Hoogh, K.* ; Janssen, N.A.H.* ; Katsouyanni, K.* ; Klompmaker, J.O.* ; Kristoffersen, D.T.* ; Lim, Y.H.* ; Oftedal, B.* ; Strak, M.* ; Vienneau, D.* ; Zhang, J.* ; Burnett, R.T.* ; Hoek, G.* ; Dominici, F.* ; Brauer, M.* ; Brunekreef, B.*
Long-term exposure to low-level PM2.5 and mortality: Investigation of heterogeneity by harmonizing analyses in large cohort studies in Canada, United States, and Europe.
Environ. Health Perspect. 131:127003 (2023)
BACKGROUND: Studies across the globe generally reported increased mortality risks associated with particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5μm (PM2.5) exposure with large heterogeneity in the magnitude of reported associations and the shape of concentration-response functions (CRFs). We aimed to evaluate the impact of key study design factors (including confounders, applied exposure model, population age, and outcome definition) on PM2.5 effect estimates by harmonizing analyses on three previously published large studies in Canada [Mortality-Air Pollution Associations in Low Exposure Environments (MAPLE), 1991-2016], the United States (Medicare, 2000-2016), and Europe [Effects of Low-Level Air Pollution: A Study in Europe (ELAPSE), 2000-2016] as much as possible. METHODS: We harmonized the study populations to individuals 65+ years of age, applied the same satellite-derived PM2.5 exposure estimates, and selected the same sets of potential confounders and the same outcome. We evaluated whether differences in previously published effect estimates across cohorts were reduced after harmonization among these factors. Additional analyses were conducted to assess the influence of key design features on estimated risks, including adjusted covariates and exposure assessment method. A combined CRF was assessed with meta-analysis based on the extended shape-constrained health impact function (eSCHIF). RESULTS: More than 81 million participants were included, contributing 692 million person-years of follow-up. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause mortality associated with a 5-μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 were 1.039 (1.032, 1.046) in MAPLE, 1.025 (1.021, 1.029) in Medicare, and 1.041 (1.014, 1.069) in ELAPSE. Applying a harmonized analytical approach marginally reduced difference in the observed associations across the three studies. Magnitude of the association was affected by the adjusted covariates, exposure assessment methodology, age of the population, and marginally by outcome definition. Shape of the CRFs differed across cohorts but generally showed associations down to the lowest observed PM2.5 levels. A common CRF suggested a monotonically increased risk down to the lowest exposure level. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12141.
Impact Factor
Scopus SNIP
Web of Science
Times Cited
Scopus
Cited By
Altmetric
Publikationstyp
Artikel: Journalartikel
Dokumenttyp
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Typ der Hochschulschrift
Herausgeber
Schlagwörter
Census Health; Disparities
Keywords plus
Sprache
englisch
Veröffentlichungsjahr
2023
Prepublished im Jahr
0
HGF-Berichtsjahr
2023
ISSN (print) / ISBN
0091-6765
e-ISSN
1552-9924
ISBN
Bandtitel
Konferenztitel
Konferzenzdatum
Konferenzort
Konferenzband
Quellenangaben
Band: 131,
Heft: 12,
Seiten: ,
Artikelnummer: 127003
Supplement: ,
Reihe
Verlag
Research Triangle Park
Verlagsort
NC [u.a.]
Tag d. mündl. Prüfung
0000-00-00
Betreuer
Gutachter
Prüfer
Topic
Hochschule
Hochschulort
Fakultät
Veröffentlichungsdatum
0000-00-00
Anmeldedatum
0000-00-00
Anmelder/Inhaber
weitere Inhaber
Anmeldeland
Priorität
Begutachtungsstatus
Peer reviewed
Institut(e)
Institute of Epidemiology (EPI)
POF Topic(s)
30202 - Environmental Health
Forschungsfeld(er)
Genetics and Epidemiology
PSP-Element(e)
G-504000-001
Förderungen
United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Copyright
Erfassungsdatum
2023-12-18