PuSH - Publikationsserver des Helmholtz Zentrums München: New molecular evidence of wine yeast-bacteria interaction unraveled by non-targeted exometabolomic profiling.

Informationen

Hinweise zu Qualitätskriterien von Zeitschriften

Open-Access-Richtlinie der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft 2016

CC Licencences

Metriken für Publikationen

Navigation

Startseite

English

EVA: Veröffentlichen

Neuer EVA Antrag

Recherche

Erweiterte Suche

Durchblättern nach ...

... HMGU-Autoren/Konsortien

... Organisationsstruktur

... Zeitschriften

... Publikationstypen

... Forschungsdaten

... Arbeitsgruppen

... Erscheinungsjahr

Publikationen im Überblick

Statistik

HGF Fortschrittsbericht

OA Publikationen

Eintragen

Neue Publikation eintragen

Neue Publikation holen aus...

...EVA

Fehlende Publikation melden

Highlights

Suche

Hilfe & Kontakt

Ansprechpartner

Hilfe

Datenschutz

Helmholtz Open Science

Bibliometrische Indikatoren

SHERPA/RoMEO

DOAJ

Export:

Text

Endnote (RIS) BIB

BibTeX

Liu, Y. ; Forcisi, S. ; Harir, M. ; Deleris-Bou, M.* ; Krieger-Weber, S.* ; Lucio, M. ; Longin, C.* ; Degueurce, C.* ; Gougeon, R.D.* ; Schmitt-Kopplin, P. ; Alexandre, H.*

New molecular evidence of wine yeast-bacteria interaction unraveled by non-targeted exometabolomic profiling.

Metabolomics 12:69 (2016)

DOI

Open Access Green möglich sobald Postprint bei der ZB eingereicht worden ist.

Abstract
Metriken
Zusatzinfos

Introduction: Bacterial malolactic fermentation (MLF) has a considerable impact on wine quality. The yeast strain used for primary fermentation can systematically stimulate (MLF+ phenotype) or inhibit (MLF−) bacteria and the MLF process as a function of numerous winemaking practices, but the underlying molecular evidence still remains a mystery. Objectives: The goal of the study was to elucidate such evidence by the direct comparison of extracellular metabolic profiles of MLF+ and MLF− phenotypes. Methods: We have applied a non-targeted metabolomic approach combining ultrahigh-resolution FT-ICR-MS analysis, powerful statistical tools and a comprehensive wine metabolite database. Results: We discovered around 2500 unknown masses and 800 putative biomarkers involved in phenotypic distinction. For the putative biomarkers, we also developed a biomarker identification workflow and elucidated the exact structure (by UPLC-Q-ToF–MS2) and/or exact physiological impact (by in vitro tests) of several novel biomarkers, such as D-gluconic acid, citric acid, trehalose and tripeptide Pro-Phe-Val. In addition to valid biomarkers, molecular evidence was reflected by unprecedented chemical diversity (around 3000 discriminant masses) that characterized both the yeast phenotypes. While distinct chemical families such as phenolic compounds, carbohydrates, amino acids and peptides characterize the extracellular metabolic profiles of the MLF+ phenotype, the MLF− phenotype is associated with sulphur-containing peptides. Conclusion: The non-targeted approach used in this study played an important role in finding new and unexpected molecular evidence.

Impact Factor

Scopus SNIP

Web of Science
Times Cited

Scopus
Cited By

Altmetric

3.661

1.142