PuSH - Publikationsserver des Helmholtz Zentrums München

Export: TXT Text RIS Endnote (RIS) BIB BibTeX
Maya-Manzano, J.M. ; Tummon, F.* ; Abt, R.* ; Allan, N.* ; Bunderson, L.* ; Clot, B.* ; Crouzy, B.* ; Daunys, G.* ; Erb, S.* ; González-Alonso, M.* ; Graf, E.* ; Grewling, L.* ; Haus, J.* ; Kadantsev, E.* ; Kawashima, S.* ; Martínez-Bracero, M.* ; Matavulj, P.* ; Mills, S.* ; Niederberger, E.* ; Lieberherr, G.* ; Lucas, R.W.* ; O'Connor, D.J.* ; Oteros, J.* ; Palamarchuk, J.* ; Pope, F.D.* ; Rojo, J.* ; Sauliene, I.* ; Schäfer, S.* ; Schmidt-Weber, C.B. ; Schnitzler, M.* ; Šikoparija, B.* ; Skjøth, C.A.* ; Sofiev, M.* ; Stemmler, T.* ; Triviño, M. ; Zeder, Y.* ; Buters, J.T.M.

Towards European automatic bioaerosol monitoring: Comparison of 9 automatic pollen observational instruments with classic Hirst-type traps.

Sci. Total Environ. 866:161220 (2023)
Verlagsversion DOI PMC
Open Access Hybrid
Creative Commons Lizenzvertrag
To benefit allergy patients and the medical practitioners, pollen information should be available in both a reliable and timely manner; the latter is only recently possible due to automatic monitoring. To evaluate the performance of all currently available automatic instruments, an international intercomparison campaign was jointly organised by the EUMETNET AutoPollen Programme and the ADOPT COST Action in Munich, Germany (March-July 2021). The automatic systems (hardware plus identification algorithms) were compared with manual Hirst-type traps. Measurements were aggregated into 3-hourly or daily values to allow comparison across all devices. We report results for total pollen as well as for Betula, Fraxinus, Poaceae, and Quercus, for all instruments that provided these data. The results for daily averages compared better with Hirst observations than the 3-hourly values. For total pollen, there was a considerable spread among systems, with some reaching R2 > 0.6 (3 h) and R2 > 0.75 (daily) compared with Hirst-type traps, whilst other systems were not suitable to sample total pollen efficiently (R2 < 0.3). For individual pollen types, results similar to the Hirst were frequently shown by a small group of systems. For Betula, almost all systems performed well (R2 > 0.75 for 9 systems for 3-hourly data). Results for Fraxinus and Quercus were not as good for most systems, while for Poaceae (with some exceptions), the performance was weakest. For all pollen types and for most measurement systems, false positive classifications were observed outside of the main pollen season. Different algorithms applied to the same device also showed different results, highlighting the importance of this aspect of the measurement system. Overall, given the 30 % error on daily concentrations that is currently accepted for Hirst-type traps, several automatic systems are currently capable of being used operationally to provide real-time observations at high temporal resolutions. They provide distinct advantages compared to the manual Hirst-type measurements.
Impact Factor
Scopus SNIP
Web of Science
Times Cited
Altmetric
9.800
0.000
6
Tags
Anmerkungen
Besondere Publikation
Auf Hompepage verbergern

Zusatzinfos bearbeiten
Eigene Tags bearbeiten
Privat
Eigene Anmerkung bearbeiten
Privat
Auf Publikationslisten für
Homepage nicht anzeigen
Als besondere Publikation
markieren
Publikationstyp Artikel: Journalartikel
Dokumenttyp Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Schlagwörter Aerobiology ; Automatic Monitoring ; Intercomparison Campaign ; Pollen ; Pollen Classification ; Real-time; Particle Counter; Quality-control; Aerosol; Allergy
Sprache englisch
Veröffentlichungsjahr 2023
Prepublished im Jahr 2022
HGF-Berichtsjahr 2022
ISSN (print) / ISBN 0048-9697
e-ISSN 1879-1026
Zeitschrift Science of the Total Environment, The
Quellenangaben Band: 866, Heft: , Seiten: , Artikelnummer: 161220 Supplement: ,
Verlag Elsevier
Verlagsort Radarweg 29, 1043 Nx Amsterdam, Netherlands
Begutachtungsstatus Peer reviewed
Institut(e) Institute for Allergy Research (IAF)
POF Topic(s) 30202 - Environmental Health
Forschungsfeld(er) Allergy
PSP-Element(e) G-505400-001
Förderungen Academy of Finland (AKA)

Academy of Finland project ALL-Impress
COST Action
EUMETNET AutoPollen Programme
Research Council of Lithuania (LMTLT)
European Social Fund
Academy of Finland projects PS4A
BREATHE project from the Science Fund of the Republic of Serbia PROMIS program
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161220
WOS ID 000922647500001
Scopus ID 85145975471
PubMed ID 36584954
Erfassungsdatum 2023-01-12
[➜Korrektur melden]