Plaza-Díaz, J.* ; Ruiz Ojeda, F.J. ; Morales, J.* ; de la Torre, A.I.C.* ; García-García, A.* ; de Prado, C.N.* ; Coronel-Rodríguez, C.* ; Crespo, C.J.* ; Ortega, E.* ; Martín-Pérez, E.* ; Ferreira, F.* ; García-Ron, G.* ; Galicia, I.* ; Santos-García-Cuéllar, M.T.* ; Maroto, M.* ; Ruiz, P.* ; Martín-Molina, R.* ; Viver-Gómez, S.* ; Gil, A.*
Effects of a novel infant formula on weight gain, body composition, safety and tolerability to infants: The INNOVA 2020 Study.
Nutrients 15:147 (2023)
Exclusive breastfeeding is recommended for the first six months of life to promote adequate infant growth and development, and to reduce infant morbidity and mortality. However, whenever some mothers are not able to breastfeed their infants, infant formulas mimicking human milk are needed, and the safety and efficacy of each formula should be tested. Here, we report the results of a multicenter, randomized, blinded, controlled clinical trial that aimed to evaluate a novel starting formula on weight gain and body composition of infants up to 6 and 12 months, as well as safety and tolerability. For the intervention period, infants were divided into three groups: group 1 received formula 1 (Nutribén® Innova 1 (Alter Farmacia S.A., Madrid, Spain) or INN (n = 70)), with a lower amount of protein, a lower casein to whey protein ratio by increasing the content of α-lactalbumin, and a double amount of docosahexaenoic acid/arachidonic acid than the standard formula; it also contained a thermally inactivated postbiotic (Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, BPL1TM HT). Group 2 received the standard formula or formula 2 (Nutriben® Natal (Alter Farmacia S.A., Madrid, Spain) or STD (n = 70)) and the third group was exclusively breastfed for exploratory analysis and used as a reference (BFD group (n = 70)). During the study, visits were made at 21 days and 2, 4, 6, and 12 months of age. Weight gain was higher in both formula groups than in the BFD group at 6 and 12 months, whereas no differences were found between STD and INN groups either at 6 or at 12 months. Likewise, body mass index was higher in infants fed the two formulas compared with the BFD group. Regarding body composition, length, head circumference and tricipital/subscapular skinfolds were alike between groups. The INN formula was considered safe as weight gain and body composition were within the normal limits, according to WHO standards. The BFD group exhibited more liquid consistency in the stools compared to both formula groups. All groups showed similar digestive tolerance and infant behavior. However, a higher frequency of gastrointestinal symptoms was reported by the STD formula group (n = 291), followed by the INN formula (n = 282), and the BFD groups (n = 227). There were fewer respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders among BFD children. Additionally, infants receiving the INN formula experienced significantly fewer general disorders and disturbances than those receiving the STD formula. Indeed, atopic dermatitis, bronchitis, and bronchiolitis were significantly more prevalent among infants who were fed the STD formula compared to those fed the INN formula or breastfed. To evaluate whether there were significant differences between formula treatments, beyond growth parameters, it would seem necessary to examine more precise health biomarkers and to carry out long-term longitudinal studies.
Impact Factor
Scopus SNIP
Web of Science
Times Cited
Scopus
Cited By
Altmetric
Publikationstyp
Artikel: Journalartikel
Dokumenttyp
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Typ der Hochschulschrift
Herausgeber
Schlagwörter
Bpl1tm ; Bifidobacterium Animalis Subsp. Lactis ; Arachidonic Acid ; Body Composition ; Docosahexaenoic Acid ; Infant Formula ; Postbiotics ; Protein ; Safety ; α-lactalbumin; Alpha-lactalbumin; Human-milk; Follow-up; Arachidonic-acid; Protein-content; Term Infants; Double-blind; Breast-milk; 1st Year; Age
Keywords plus
Sprache
englisch
Veröffentlichungsjahr
2023
Prepublished im Jahr
2022
HGF-Berichtsjahr
2022
ISSN (print) / ISBN
2072-6643
e-ISSN
2072-6643
ISBN
Bandtitel
Konferenztitel
Konferzenzdatum
Konferenzort
Konferenzband
Quellenangaben
Band: 15,
Heft: 1,
Seiten: ,
Artikelnummer: 147
Supplement: ,
Reihe
Verlag
MDPI
Verlagsort
Basel
Tag d. mündl. Prüfung
0000-00-00
Betreuer
Gutachter
Prüfer
Topic
Hochschule
Hochschulort
Fakultät
Veröffentlichungsdatum
0000-00-00
Anmeldedatum
0000-00-00
Anmelder/Inhaber
weitere Inhaber
Anmeldeland
Priorität
Begutachtungsstatus
Peer reviewed
POF Topic(s)
30201 - Metabolic Health
Forschungsfeld(er)
Helmholtz Diabetes Center
PSP-Element(e)
G-502296-001
Förderungen
Alter Farmacia S.A
Copyright
Erfassungsdatum
2023-01-19