PuSH - Publikationsserver des Helmholtz Zentrums München: Comparison of the accuracy of commercial two-point and multi-echo Dixon MRI for quantification of fat in liver, paravertebral muscles, and vertebral bone marrow.

Informationen

Hinweise zu Qualitätskriterien von Zeitschriften

Open-Access-Richtlinie der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft 2016

CC Licencences

Metriken für Publikationen

Navigation

Startseite

English

EVA: Veröffentlichen

Neuer EVA Antrag

Recherche

Erweiterte Suche

Durchblättern nach ...

... HMGU-Autoren/Konsortien

... Organisationsstruktur

... Zeitschriften

... Publikationstypen

... Forschungsdaten

... Arbeitsgruppen

... Erscheinungsjahr

Publikationen im Überblick

Statistik

HGF Fortschrittsbericht

OA Publikationen

Eintragen

Neue Publikation eintragen

Neue Publikation holen aus...

...EVA

Fehlende Publikation melden

Highlights

Suche

Hilfe & Kontakt

Ansprechpartner

Hilfe

Datenschutz

Helmholtz Open Science

Bibliometrische Indikatoren

SHERPA/RoMEO

DOAJ

Export:

Text

Endnote (RIS) BIB

BibTeX

Haueise, T. ; Schick, F. ; Stefan, N.* ; Machann, J.

Comparison of the accuracy of commercial two-point and multi-echo Dixon MRI for quantification of fat in liver, paravertebral muscles, and vertebral bone marrow.

Eur. J. Radiol. 172:111359 (2024)

Verlagsversion

DOI

PMC

	Open Access Hybrid

Abstract
Metriken
Zusatzinfos

PURPOSE: Excess fat accumulation contributes significantly to metabolic dysfunction and diseases. This study aims to systematically compare the accuracy of commercially available Dixon techniques for quantification of fat fraction in liver, skeletal musculature, and vertebral bone marrow (BM) of healthy individuals, investigating biases and sex-specific influences. METHOD: 100 healthy White individuals (50 women) underwent abdominal MRI using two-point and multi-echo Dixon sequences. Fat fraction (FF), proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and T2* values were calculated for liver, paravertebral muscles (PVM) and vertebral BM (Th8-L5). Agreement and systematic deviations were assessed using linear correlation and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: High correlations between FF and PDFF were observed in liver (r = 0.98 for women; r = 0.96 for men), PVM (r = 0.92 for women; r = 0.93 for men) and BM (r = 0.97 for women; r = 0.95 for men). Relative deviations between FF and PDFF in liver (18.92 % for women; 13.32 % for men) and PVM (1.96 % for women; 11.62 % for men) were not significant. Relative deviations in BM were significant (38.13 % for women; 27.62 % for men). Bias correction using linear models reduced discrepancies. T2* times were significantly shorter in BM (8.72 ms for women; 7.26 ms for men) compared to PVM (13.45 ms for women; 13.62 ms for men) and liver (29.47 ms for women; 26.35 ms for men). CONCLUSION: While no significant differences were observed for liver and PVM, systematic errors in BM FF estimation using two-point Dixon imaging were observed. These discrepancies - mainly resulting from organ-specific T2* times - have to be considered when applying two-point Dixon approaches for assessment of fat content. As suitable correction tools, linear models could provide added value in large-scale epidemiological cohort studies. Sex-specific differences in T2* should be considered.

Impact Factor

Scopus SNIP

Altmetric

3.200

0.000