Inflation in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary statistics represents a major challenge, for which correction methods have been developed. These include the genomic control (GC) method, which uses the λ-value to correct summary statistics, and the linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSR) method, which uses the LDSR intercept. By using type 2 diabetes (T2D) as an exemplar, we explore factors influencing λ-values and the impact of these corrections on association signals. We find that larger sample sizes increase λ-values due to increased captured polygenicity, while including lower frequency variants decreases λ-values due to reduced power. Comparing T2D genetic associations described in overlapping GWAS meta-analyses of increasing sample size, we find that GC correction reduces the false positive rate and leads to the loss of robust associations. In one of the largest meta-analysis, GC correction results in 39.7% loss of independent loci, substantially reducing the number of detected associations. In comparison, the LDSR intercept correction leads to a loss of up to 25.2% of the independent loci, being therefore less conservative than the GC correction. We conclude that in large, well-powered GWAS meta-analysis of polygenic traits, both GC and LDSR intercept correction leads to power loss, highlighting the need for improved genomic inflation correction methods.
Verlagsort111 River St, Hoboken 07030-5774, Nj Usa
Hochschule
Hochschulort
Fakultät
Veröffentlichungsdatum0000-00-00
Veröffentlichungsnummer
Anmeldedatum0000-00-00
Anmelder/Inhaber
weitere Inhaber
Anmeldeland
Priorität
BegutachtungsstatusPeer reviewed
Institut(e)Institute of Translational Genomics (ITG)
FörderungenArchit Singh and Dr Ozvan Bocher have received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Grant Agreement No 101017802 (OPTOMICS).