PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München: A comparison of methods for quantifying prediction uncertainty in systems biology.

Information

Clues to quality of journals

Open Access Policy of Helmholtz Association 2016

CC Licencences

Publication Metrics

Navigation

Home

Deutsch

Research

Advanced Search

Browse by ...

... HMGU-Authors/Consortia

... Organizational Structure

... Journal

... Publication Type

... Research Data

... Arbeitsgruppen

... Publication Year

Publication overview

Statistics

Statistics (last 5 years)

OA Publications

Publish

Submit Publication

Import publication from...

...EVA

Report missing publication

Highlights

Support & Contact

Contact persons

Help

Data protection

Helmholtz Open Science

JANE Journal Estimator

SHERPA/RoMEO

DOAJ

Export:

Text

Endnote (RIS) BIB

BibTeX

Villaverde, A.F.* ; Raimundez-Alvarez, E. ; Hasenauer, J. ; Banga, J.R.*

A comparison of methods for quantifying prediction uncertainty in systems biology.

IFAC PapersOnline 52, 45-51 (2019)

Publ. Version/Full Text

DOI

	Open Access Gold

Abstract
Metrics
Extra information

The parameters of dynamical models of biological processes always possess some degree of uncertainty. This parameter uncertainty translates into an uncertainty of model predictions. The trajectories of unmeasured state variables are examples of such predictions. Quantifying the uncertainty associated with a given prediction is an important problem for model developers and users. However, the nonlinearity and complexity of most dynamical models renders it nontrivial. Here, we evaluate three state-of-the-art approaches for prediction uncertainty quantification using two models of different sizes and computational complexities. We discuss the trade-offs between applicability and statistical interpretability of the different methods, and provide guidelines for their application.

Impact Factor

Scopus SNIP

Scopus
Cited By

Altmetric

0.000

0.552