PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München: Crop growth and soil water fluxes at erosion-affected arable sites: Using weighing lysimeter data for model intercomparison.

Navigation

Home

Deutsch

Research

Advanced Search

Browse by ...

... Journal

... Publication Type

... Research Data

... Publication Year

Publication overview

Support & Contact

Contact persons

Help

Data protection

Groh, J.* ; Diamantopoulos, E.* ; Duan, X. ; Ewert, F.* ; Herbst, M.* ; Holbak, M.* ; Kamali, B.* ; Kersebaum, K.C.* ; Kuhnert, M.* ; Lischeid, G.* ; Nendel, C.* ; Priesack, E. ; Steidl, J.* ; Sommer, M.* ; Pütz, T.* ; Vereecken, H.* ; Wallor, E.* ; Weber, T.K.D.* ; Wegehenkel, M.* ; Weihermüller, L.* ; Gerke, H.H.*

Crop growth and soil water fluxes at erosion-affected arable sites: Using weighing lysimeter data for model intercomparison.

Vadose Zone J. 19:e20058 (2020)

Publ. Version/Full Text

Research data

DOI

	Open Access Gold

Abstract
Metrics
Extra information

Agroecosystem models need to reliably simulate all biophysical processes that control crop growth, particularly the soil water fluxes and nutrient dynamics. As a result of the erosion history, truncated and colluvial soil profiles coexist in arable fields. The erosion-affected field-scale soil spatial heterogeneity may limit agroecosystem model predictions. The objective was to identify the variation in the importance of soil properties and soil profile modifications in agroecosystem models for both agronomic and environmental performance. Four lysimeters with different soil types were used that cover the range of soil variability in an erosion-affected hummocky agricultural landscape. Twelve models were calibrated on crop phenological stages, and model performance was tested against observed grain yield, aboveground biomass, leaf area index, actual evapotranspiration, drainage, and soil water content. Despite considering identical input data, the predictive capability among models was highly diverse. Neither a single crop model nor the multi-model mean was able to capture the observed differences between the four soil profiles in agronomic and environmental variables. The model's sensitivity to soil-related parameters was apparently limited and dependent on model structure and parameterization. Information on phenology alone seemed insufficient to calibrate crop models. The results demonstrated model-specific differences in the impact of soil variability and suggested that soil matters in predictive agroecosystem models. Soil processes need to receive greater attention in field-scale agroecosystem modeling; high-precision weighable lysimeters can provide valuable data for improving the description of soil–vegetation–atmosphere process in the tested models.

Altmetric

Additional Metrics?

[➜Log in]

Edit extra informations Login

Publication type Article: Journal article

Document type Scientific Article

Corresponding Author

ISSN (print) / ISBN 1539-1663

e-ISSN 1539-1663

Journal Vadose Zone Journal

Quellenangaben Volume: 19, Issue: 1, Article Number: e20058

Publisher Soil Science Society of America

Publishing Place Madison, Wis.

Non-patent literature Publications

Reviewing status Peer reviewed

Institute(s) Research Unit Environmental Simulation (EUS)
Institute of Biochemical Plant Pathology (BIOP)

Grants Projekt DEAL
Collaborative Research Center 1253 CAMPOS (Project 7: Stochastic Modeling Framework) - German Research Foundation (DFG)
I4S Project within the BMBF BonaRes Program
Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
SOILCan - Helmholtz Association (HGF)
TERENO