PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München: A comparative analysis of the sensitivity, specificity, concordance, and the 5-year predictive power of diabetes-related autoantibody assays.

Information

Clues to quality of journals

Open Access Policy of Helmholtz Association 2016

CC Licencences

Publication Metrics

Navigation

Home

Deutsch

Research

Advanced Search

Browse by ...

... HMGU-Authors/Consortia

... Organizational Structure

... Journal

... Publication Type

... Research Data

... Arbeitsgruppen

... Publication Year

Publication overview

Statistics

Statistics (last 5 years)

OA Publications

Publish

Submit Publication

Import publication from...

...EVA

Report missing publication

Highlights

Support & Contact

Contact persons

Help

Data protection

Helmholtz Open Science

JANE Journal Estimator

SHERPA/RoMEO

DOAJ

Export:

Text

Endnote (RIS) BIB

BibTeX

Krischer, J.P.* ; Muller, S.* ; You, L.* ; Achenbach, P. ; Bazzigaluppi, E.* ; Brigatti, C.* ; Lampasona, V.* ; Mathew, A.* ; Robinson, P.N.* ; Seftel, D.* ; Sigal, G.* ; Tsai, C.T.* ; Wang, M.* ; Yu, L.*

A comparative analysis of the sensitivity, specificity, concordance, and the 5-year predictive power of diabetes-related autoantibody assays.

Diabetes 74, 1535-1546 (2025)

DOI

PMC

Open Access Green as soon as Postprint is submitted to ZB.

Abstract
Metrics
Extra information

This study compares novel type 1 diabetes-related autoantibody assays developed to improve upon the standard radiobinding assay (RBA). Samples from 1505 individuals, followed for 5 years or to clinical type 1 diabetes, originally tested by RBA were aliquoted and sent blindly to 5 laboratories (BDC, IDR, DRI, MSD, Enable) to be tested by electrochemiluminescence (ECL) assays, Luciferase Immuno Precipitation System (LIPS) assays, multiplex antibody detection by agglutination-PCR (ADAP) assays, and N-terminally truncated GAD65 or IA2β autoantibody RBAs (tGADA/IA2βA). Findings: The fraction of samples that were concordant for negative/positive interpretations across all assays were 79.7% (GADA), 65.2% (IA-2A), 36.2% (IAA), and 67.5% (ZnT8A). The assays with the highest Youden index for predicting the previous RBA results differed by autoantibody: 0.65 LIPS(IDR) for IAA, 0.91 ECL(BDC) for ZnT8A, 0.82 tGADA RBA(IDR) for GADA, 0.91 ECL(MSD and BDC) for IA-2A. The Youden index for predicting 5-year type 1 diabetes varied significantly across assays and was highest for LIPS(DRI) for all autoantibody combinations, with little variation in the respective maximum Youden index. The discordance between assays makes it problematic to interpret positivity when comparing results from different assays. Longitudinal autoantibody assessments should be tested with the same assay.

Impact Factor

Scopus SNIP

Web of Science
Times Cited

Scopus
Cited By

Altmetric

7.500

0.000