PuSH - Publikationsserver des Helmholtz Zentrums München

Export: TXT Text RIS Endnote (RIS) BIB BibTeX
de Hoogh, K.* ; Korek, M.* ; Vienneau, D.* ; Keuken, M.* ; Kukkonen, J.V.K.* ; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J.* ; Badaloni, C.* ; Beelen, R.* ; Bolignano, A.* ; Cesaroni, G.* ; Pradas, M.C.* ; Cyrys, J. ; Douros, J.* ; Eeftens, M.* ; Forastiere, F.* ; Forsberg, B.* ; Fuks, K.* ; Gehring, U.* ; Gryparis, A.* ; Gulliver, J.* ; Hansell, A.L.* ; Hoffmann, B.* ; Johansson, C.* ; Jonkers, S.* ; Kangas, L.* ; Katsouyanni, K.* ; Künzli, N.* ; Lanki, T.* ; Memmesheimer, M.* ; Moussiopoulos, N.* ; Modig, L.* ; Pershagen, G.* ; Probst-Hensch, N.* ; Schindler, C.* ; Schikowski, T.* ; Sugiri, D.* ; Teixidó, O.* ; Tsai, M.Y.* ; Yli-Tuomi, T.* ; Brunekreef, B.* ; Hoek, G.* ; Bellander, T.*

Comparing land use regression and dispersion modelling to assess residential exposure to ambient air pollution for epidemiological studies.

Environ. Int. 73, 382-392 (2014)
Verlagsversion DOI PMC
Open Access Gold
BACKGROUND: Land-use regression (LUR) and dispersion models (DM) are commonly used for estimating individual air pollution exposure in population studies. Few comparisons have however been made of the performance of these methods. OBJECTIVES: Within the European Study of Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects (ESCAPE) we explored the differences between LUR and DM estimates for NO2, PM10 and PM2.5. METHODS: The ESCAPE study developed LUR models for outdoor air pollution levels based on a harmonised monitoring campaign. In thirteen ESCAPE study areas we further applied dispersion models. We compared LUR and DM estimates at the residential addresses of participants in 13 cohorts for NO2; 7 for PM10 and 4 for PM2.5. Additionally, we compared the DM estimates with measured concentrations at the 20-40 ESCAPE monitoring sites in each area. RESULTS: The median Pearson R (range) correlation coefficients between LUR and DM estimates for the annual average concentrations of NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 were 0.75 (0.19-0.89), 0.39 (0.23-0.66) and 0.29 (0.22-0.81) for 112,971 (13 study areas), 69,591 (7) and 28,519 (4) addresses respectively. The median Pearson R correlation coefficients (range) between DM estimates and ESCAPE measurements were of 0.74 (0.09-0.86) for NO2; 0.58 (0.36-0.88) for PM10 and 0.58 (0.39-0.66) for PM2.5. CONCLUSIONS: LUR and dispersion model estimates correlated on average well for NO2 but only moderately for PM10 and PM2.5, with large variability across areas. DM predicted a moderate to large proportion of the measured variation for NO2 but less for PM10 and PM2.5.
Impact Factor
Scopus SNIP
Web of Science
Times Cited
Scopus
Cited By
Altmetric
5.664
2.203
83
97
Tags
Anmerkungen
Besondere Publikation
Auf Hompepage verbergern

Zusatzinfos bearbeiten
Eigene Tags bearbeiten
Privat
Eigene Anmerkung bearbeiten
Privat
Auf Publikationslisten für
Homepage nicht anzeigen
Als besondere Publikation
markieren
Publikationstyp Artikel: Journalartikel
Dokumenttyp Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
Schlagwörter Air Pollution ; Cohort ; Dispersion Modelling ; Exposure ; Land Use Regression
Sprache englisch
Veröffentlichungsjahr 2014
HGF-Berichtsjahr 2014
ISSN (print) / ISBN 0160-4120
e-ISSN 1873-6750
Zeitschrift Environment International
Quellenangaben Band: 73, Heft: , Seiten: 382-392 Artikelnummer: , Supplement: ,
Verlag Elsevier
Begutachtungsstatus Peer reviewed
Institut(e) Institute of Epidemiology (EPI)
POF Topic(s) 30202 - Environmental Health
Forschungsfeld(er) Genetics and Epidemiology
PSP-Element(e) G-504000-004
PubMed ID 25233102
DOI 10.1016/j.envint.2014.08.011
WOS ID WOS:000345540700043
Scopus ID 84907726383
Erfassungsdatum 2014-09-20
[➜Korrektur melden]